Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (wilbur53, Otto Skorzeny, Greg_H, 68ironhead, WICruiser, Gdads51, Shade Baby, rinemb, 1 invisible),
243
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,095 Posts1,056,075 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | I am still working on putting together my 48 2 ton with the Detroit Diesel. I now have my newer Dana 70HD with disk brakes installed in the rear. I also have my 22.5" wheels installed. I was measuring the width over the rear tires and get about 7 feet wide, or 84" if you prefer. I think that is the width I will have my new bed made to, so it just barely covers the tires.
My question is what is the normal overall width of a flatbed on an AD 1.5 or 2 ton?
Thanks,
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I want to hear the answer to this one. I have wondered about this for a long time. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 | My 40 ton and a half was seven feet wide. I was told that seven foot beds worked better for farm work in the fields, don't know if it's true or not. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 21 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 21 | The specs book for 1954 trucks says that the 1 ton, 1.5 ton, and 2 ton overall bed (platform) width measures 91.56". That's just a little over 7.5', so you guys weren't too far off. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | When I first got into the truck body business back in the 60's a common dump body was 6'6" ID (78") width so that made the OD 87-90" depending on the maker. The military bodies we built were 90" so somewhere near that should be correct for a 50's era body but bare in mind that the normal tire then was an 8:25x20 so perhaps 87-88" is better. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | My grain bed made by an outfitter is 7.5' wide X 12' long, Scott | | | | | Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 Former Workshop Owner | | Former Workshop Owner Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 | On my red '42, I have a 7 foot wide bed. I haven't secured it yet, but it looks pretty cool to me, as it just covers the back wheels. It came off of a 1970 one ton. My other two trucks that have flatbeds, I believe are right at 8 foot.
John
~ J Lucas 2006 GMC Envoy 4.2 I6 2023 Ram 2500/Cumins 6.7 I6 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (Wife’s) 2002 Silverado 2500 Gas 6.0 1941 Chevy 1/2-Ton 1942 Chevy 1.5-Ton SWBIn the Gallery My Flicker Photos! | | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 584 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 584 | I have a GM 1946 dealer built flatbed that is exactly 8 feet wide. Keep in mind however that your rearend setup sounds like it is several inches narrower than stock. I think I measured about 90 inches with tire on mine if I remember right. The 8 foot bed gives me about a 3 inch overhang on each side which looks very nice considering tire size and everything. Also consider how high off the rear wheels your bed will be. If it sits close to the tires it will look better narrower. As it moves up off the tire, IMO you need a little more overhang to get the same look. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Looks like if I make mine 7' it will be a tad narrower than normal. That is fine with me, I was just curious as to how would it will be. I would like to keep my truck as narrow as possible. A new f250 single rear wheels is also 7' overall on the pickup bed, so my truck with duals will be the same width as a new single wheeled truck. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 66 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 66 | There's plenty of period pictures of stake bodies in the J.C. catalogue, perhaps you could scale them out. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 261 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 261 | 1934 through 1936 high cab stake racks were 81&1/2 in wide, 1936 low cab through 1938 stake rack was increased to 86 & 1/2 wide. Width was increased in the 39 to 47 early trucks to approximately 87 in.
34 & 35 trucks are the greatest
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 453 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 453 | Since we're on the subject of flatbeds, has anyone replaced the original all metal flatbed frame with wood? My flatbed is all metal frame with 1/4" plate on top. When I get to that point, I'd like to replace it with all wood frame and top. Curious if anyone's done that and if it affected the hydraulic lift? Also, how did the wood frame connect to the truck frame where it hinges for the frame? | | | | | Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 Former Workshop Owner | | Former Workshop Owner Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 | Hello mummdogg,
If you are going to use your truck, I think you would be better off to build a steel frame. If it is for only show, use wood. My '59 (it's wood) has a cracked main support rail from using the hoist. It looks like it will be a major ordeal to replace. Just my opinion.
John
~ J Lucas 2006 GMC Envoy 4.2 I6 2023 Ram 2500/Cumins 6.7 I6 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (Wife’s) 2002 Silverado 2500 Gas 6.0 1941 Chevy 1/2-Ton 1942 Chevy 1.5-Ton SWBIn the Gallery My Flicker Photos! | | | | | Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 Former Workshop Owner | | Former Workshop Owner Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 | OK, the curiosity got to me, so I broke out the tape measure and flashlight.
Red '42 83.5" wide by 95" long
Green '42 93.5 wide by 13'6" long
'59 Viking 93.5" wide by 12'6" long.
All 1 1/2 tons.
John
~ J Lucas 2006 GMC Envoy 4.2 I6 2023 Ram 2500/Cumins 6.7 I6 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (Wife’s) 2002 Silverado 2500 Gas 6.0 1941 Chevy 1/2-Ton 1942 Chevy 1.5-Ton SWBIn the Gallery My Flicker Photos! | | | | | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 7 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 7 | My 1949 4100 has an original grain dump bed that measures 84" o.d. wide. I put newer style mirrors on both sides, so I can actually see behind me, and they just barely peek around the width of the bed. I'm thinking of narrowing the bed for better visability, since it's grain hauling days are long gone. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,987 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,987 | The flatbed on my '47 is also about 94" wide. You can see how it looks relative to the wheels by clicking on the link in my signature. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 20 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 20 | I have just removed my original flat bed with grain box. Its 90" wide, I am going to rebuild and replace it with a bed that is 84" wide, equal to the out to out tire dimension. | | |
| |