Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,016 Posts1,055,337 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#67486 10/21/2006 1:52 AM | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | Hi Folks,
I have a question about GM's choice of engines in the 40's and early 50's trucks. If GM had better 6 cylinder engines with high oil pressure, why did they keep using the 216? It doesn't make sense to me to use an inferior engine when the GMC trucks had better engines.
Jeff | | |
#67487 10/21/2006 2:12 AM | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | They did it in the 80's too. Remember the 2.8L? Scott | | |
#67488 10/21/2006 2:24 AM | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 | The same reason GM had a chevy, pontiac, olds, buick, and cadillac. They covered the whole market that way. The cheapo (chevy) was basic while the snazzy (cad) had all the bells and whistles. Back then chevy and GMC were different trucks with the idea of capturing two segments of the market. It's called marketing. If the chevy had everything there would have been no market for the others.
Evan
| | |
#67489 10/21/2006 3:13 AM | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Originally posted by 48bigtrucks: They did it in the 80's too. Remember the 2.8L? Scott What's wrong with the 2.8??? My S-10 has one, great engine. I get 25 mpg running 75 mph on the highway. Yeah, they have their quirks, like the oil leaks and starter problems (just put ANOTHER one on!), but overall their good in the correct application.
Bill Burmeister | | |
#67490 10/21/2006 6:17 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | The 216 was a much higher volume production line than the GMC. It was in all the Chevy cars, too. It worked just fine for the time. You didn't drive over 45 mph much in 1950. GM would have had to add another production line or two to cover the Chevy trucks.
There is really nothing wrong with the 216 as long as you know what to watch out for. They last a long time.
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#67491 10/21/2006 10:43 PM | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | Thanks! What does one watch out for to keep the 216 running for a long time?
Jeff | | |
#67492 10/22/2006 12:20 AM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 6,377 Ex Hall Monitor | | Ex Hall Monitor Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 6,377 | Change the oil and don't over-rev it. A fellow in the VCCA forum told me hotrodders of that era preferred the splash engine. It was more dependable than the high pressure oilers.
Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet. The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion. Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
| | |
#67493 10/27/2006 4:03 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 190 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 190 | Basically if the motor works and sells for the times, your sell more with looks and appeal. The looks changed and the powerplant worked for the market sales so to save money (IMO) they left good enough alone. You can find some good reading in the Encyclopedia of Chevrolet Trucks by Don Bunn. Just picked up a copy and find it a good "libary" read. | | |
#67494 10/27/2006 5:01 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | The only real way to kill a 216 is to stretch the rods or starve the rod bearings for oil.
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#67495 10/29/2006 8:40 AM | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,096 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,096 | Like Tiny says ,, frequent oil changes (no filter remember) and easy on the gas , my 216 is still going after 66yrs.
GREAT ENGINE !!
OK,, so I wrecked a few in my youth,, but it was all 'cause I had TOO big a right boot, LOL. | | |
#67496 10/29/2006 3:28 PM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 | Throw a tach on there if you're worried about killing it.
3000 RPM is just about the limit for a "Stock" engine. If you were to throw aluminum pistons in that old girl, you could probably bump the red line up to 3500 - 4000. | | |
| |