The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (J Lucas, HandyAndy, TUTS 59), 39 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,036
Posts1,055,448
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#608261 01/08/2010 8:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 166
I
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
I Offline
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 166
I had a 350 that blew in my bus. Please don,t ask. Long story. Just curious that when this is a motorhome and fully loaded. Its a 22 foot Bluebird. GVW is 22,000 lbs. Should I go with a bigger engine ? I live in the rockies. Thanx. Cheerz !

Last edited by IsolationRide; 01/08/2010 8:05 PM.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
Find a DURAMAX with an ALLISON transmission. That will pull it.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 321
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 321
Loaded question. A stock 350 carries anywhere for 145HP to 600HP. If you have the right combination setup for low end, sure, a 350 is fine, but a 454 with a mild cam is better. I own a Durmax myself, and that is the answer, but probably not conducive to your application.

Your easiest solution would be to have the right engine builder get the right valvetrain setup for haulin for you for a 350. Probably the cheapest too. Next best bet, I'd shoot for a 454 with a cam setup.

I don't think an Duramax swap is realistic. It's drive by wire, fuel coolers, intercoolers, fuel tank swaps, etc. Too much money. Just sell the motorhome and buy something with a diesel if that's what you want.

If you're in the rockies, gearing makes a big difference as well without doing anything with the engine too.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
GVW or GVWR is 22,000?

There is a lot of it depends in answering a question like this, but I'm going to come down on the side that says no. You need more torque at lower speeds than a small block is going to make withut spending more money than a bigger motor would require.

The conventional answer is Diesel, but I'd go witha BBC or a 500 Cadillac.

How fast do you want to climb those hills? How much are you really hauling? What tires sizes and gear ratios are you running? All these things need to be coordinated.

How much are you going to drive it and how long do you plan to keep it? Those answers go a long way toward answering the Gas versus Diesel question. Diesel conversions usually cost more but if you are into this long enough they can pay off.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,961
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,961
When in mountains, there is no replacement for displacement. I would look for a big block. A stock 454 will play where a 350 has to work its guts out.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Just remember that those mountains used to be handled by an old 235 or 261. A lot of people in the auto hobby suffer from "if it's bigger it's better" disease. Not that it is a bad thing but there are folks who would say if you had an 800 cu inch Buda it was too small. A good running 350 should do fine for the average guy. Remember also that well respected auto engineers put that engine in there in the first place. Give it a chance.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
Another possibility is a 383 cu. Stroker motor.
From what I can gather they are a good compromise as they produce plenty of torque without the BIG BLOCK size,weight and (lack of) economy.
Just my 0.02c.

Last edited by jockbolter50; 01/09/2010 8:21 AM.

1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in Scotland
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Flickr.
I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings
"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
Everyone has a good point, and as Dave says "Give it a chance". A lot of school buses and trucks have been built and sold with a 350 motor and serviced the owners needs for a long time. Yes, it may be slower and you might have to downshift more to get where your going. Are you going to drive it enough to justify a bigger engine and all the stuff do make it work? My Dad had a '81 C50 Chevrolet with a 16" stake rack that I drove lots. It had a 350 2 barrel with a 4 speed, 5:83 rear end, 7:50 X 20 tires. It would go loaded (20,000#) 50 -55 all day, 40 at the top of hills in 3rd gear. But it went for 7 years without major trouble. Don

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
S
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
S Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
I personally would put in a Cummins ISB with the appropriate RD option (from a delivery truck, etc) and go that route. 2-valves are lever actuated throttle. All 4-valve engines are drive by wire, however there is a cable going from the pedal to a spring that actuates an inexpensive throttle position sensor ($20 at your FLAPS) same setup on the Isuzu engine (Duramax) or a Navistar engine (Power Stroke)

If you want to keep it petrol, follow Jock's suggestion. A 383 stroker can be made for $2500 with great torque and plenty of top end by starting with a Vortec block and heads and an engine kit - plus you can build it to run on cheep pump gas.


The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 56
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 56
I would go with the 383 since they are good engines where a 350 is to weak and a 454 is to big. just make sure you find a block with four bolt mains not the regular 2 bolts. The extra torque the 383 makes breaks the main caps off and throws the crank. I have seen the aftermath of that in a 80's camero that was converted to a 383 on a two bolt main what a mess.

As for diesel. Easiest would be to go to a 6.2 or a 6.5 turbo chev block as they mount to the same trans as a 350 and the basic computer of the 6.5 turbo would be a easy swap for you.

The Isuzu engine is good until you need injection work and then they never stop leaking and if you have bio diesel, don't run it cause it will mess up your injectors. Navistar engines weigh a great deal more then the GMC diesels and the Cummins, Also the related recals on the 7.3l and a 6.0l isn't worth anyones time since they blow turbos like kids eat candy. the Cummins ISB 5.9L engine is used in everything from the Dodge Pick up to some class 7 trucks so parts are easy to get.

Cost has to be taken into consideration a Cummins diesel from a wreaker can cost around $6000-8000 a navistar about $4500-7000 a GMC well that varies region to region but they can still go for around $5000. Correct my pricing if I am wrong it has been a while since I looked at smaller diesel pricing.

sask42 #608494 01/09/2010 3:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
GM's Goodwrench engines have a 350 replacement engine called medium duty. It is a replacement for 350 engines in 1 1/2 & 2 ton trucks. It is high torque & built rugged.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 946
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 946
383 all built with low end torque in mind. A 454 would be nice, but you will run into installation issues. The factory sent it out with a 350, so a 383 would be a nice step up.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,636
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,636
Did you say this was a 22ft Bluebird? GVW is 22,000 pounds? Seems like a lot of weight for such a short bus.

I've driven 48 passenger school buses with the 292 six and they pulled pretty decent. We have a 6% grade a little of a mile long east of town, it would slow some but still did okay.

A 350 should do fine in that bus. How did the old 350 do before it blew up?

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
2
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
2 Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
A 366 or 427 tall deck could be a good replacement. After all thats what they were built for, 4 bolt mains, steel crank lots of tork, will bolt right in and you might find one at a good price..

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Originally Posted by 28chevys
A 366 or 427 tall deck could be a good replacement. After all thats what they were built for, 4 bolt mains, steel crank lots of tork, will bolt right in and you might find one at a good price..
And LOTS of school busses used them well into the '80s.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Is a 350 enough is a very subjective question. We really need some objective performance measures here to be able to address this question.

I don't think I'd be satisfied, but clearly some of you would be. What would success look like?

IsolationRide do you really care if it's enough for me or one of the others? What would be enough for you?


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0