The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (1955 1 Series, baldeagle, cmayna), 58 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,017
Posts1,055,338
Members48,419
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#360330 01/13/2008 10:00 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224

65 c-10 swb. i want to upgrade from my standard 3 speed manual transmission to the fully synchronized saginaw 3 speed used in the 67-72 c-10s. i know the tranny is longer and some cross member as well as drive line modifications are in order.

but heres the catch....

i still want to keep the column shift setup. has this ever been attempted? is it at all possible? I know the simplest way around this type of an add on is to cut up my floor and throw in a floor shift, but thats too easy isn't it? any experience in this arena?

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
I see no problem with using the original column shifter. You might need some parts form the '67-'72 to hook it up if the arm/levers are different, but that shouldn't be too difficult.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
i figured it would prolly be alright, whats got me uncertain is if the dimension/degree of the shift box of the 60-66 is the same as the 67-72 so that the shifting arms of the later would reach without any mods...did that make any sense?

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,068
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,068
I did this in my 64. I just had to get the newer/longer shift rods and bend them to work with my truck. I got the large diameter rods, so I had to heat and bend, but it didn't take very long to get them to the point the adjusters got them right,
Scott


Scott Ward

2 1948 1.5-ton Loadmasters
The red one and The snow pusher
1 1950 3100
1 1955.1 Chevy 6500
1 1954 Chevy 6500 2-Ton
1 1955 1st Series COE 5700
1 1963 K20 (454)
1 1964 C10 (350)
1 1951 1.5-ton Dump Truck
1953 and a 1956 Ford F800

Raising a teenager is like trying to nail Jello to a tree!

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0