| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,078 Posts1,056,057 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3 | Hello,
I like the 1960-1966 style truck but I am partial to the 1960-1963 wraparound winshield. Can anyone offer me advise on which year is easier to make driveline modifications to? What are the pros and cons? My wish list is the big back window, SWB & custom cab. Thank You in advance. Paul | | | | | Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 97 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 97 | Paul,
I just recently swappd 63 sheetmetal to a 62 frame and vise versa. There are a few differences in mounting locations IE where the front of the cab mounts and where the bed mounts are.
The bigger difference was the front end. The 60-62 uses a tosion bar front end. Depending on what you are doing with the truck one might say the torsion bar is the easier one to modify. You can pull the bar out, rotate it, slide it back in and your truck is lower with out changing spring rates ect.
The 63 and up is on a coil spring between the lower A arm and frame pocket.. If you are planning on bagging the truck, you will more than likely want the 63..
60-62 also has an X frame for added support. I'm guessing for the torsion bar front.
Now most the rears you will come across are a coil set up on a truck arm. GMC I believe was leafs and optional coil but I think Chevy was coil standard.
I hope that helps a little.
Shaun
1963 Chevy P/U: Forged LS1/4L80E swap and big hit of N20 coming 1973 Camaro: Low compression solid roller LS1 with PT91 turbo Built for the Silver State classic 1967 Convert Continental: Stock Cruiser
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 3 | Thank You! Does the X frame make converting to a V-8/Auto trans swap harder because there is more frame in the way? Is the later larger I6 a unbolt and rebolt swap? There is a '62 that I am considering with very little rust available that is very reasonable. I can spin a wrench but lots of rust I cannot deal with I am not welder/body guy. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | I like the 63 up better than the earlier models. The parts are more standardized. Front end parts are rare & pricey for the 60-62. The tortion bar setup was not very practical. That is why GM droped it after 3 years. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 181 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 181 | The 63-66 had essentially the same front end as the 67-87 4x2 trucks. Makes parts cheap and you can swap in newer disc brakes from the newer ones by changing the ball joints and tie rod ends and addding the new spindle with disc brakes. That makes the choice of a 63 more attractive if you want to keep the wrap around windshield. Swapping in a V8 to a 60-62 shouldn't be a problem. The 'x' brace wasn't in the way of engine/ trans components. Buy the truck, then buy the assembly manual. It's a big help when you want to see how something went together. If you buy the right manual, it covers all 60-66 model PU's. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 738 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 738 | Shaun,
I own a '61 and personally I think that the 60 and 61 bodystyle is the best. The headlights and grill look much better and so on. I think that torsion bars are great because it made lowering the front end of my truck SUPER easy. I guess that if you haven't bought one yet you still have time to choose. I would definitely get a 60-62 because the wraparound windhield and knee knocker doors kick butt. I guess I am not much help, good luck and welcome!
Kyle
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." - George S. Patton My Machine | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 613 Member | | Member Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 613 | you can put the 60-61 grills on the later trucks.i did. | | | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 920 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2004 Posts: 920 | You have the right truck. It doesn't matter so much for the engine as it does for your chassis. Just check the vendors and EVERYTHING is available for your chassis. Suspension and brake modifications/upgrades are pretty much bolt-ins. But the opposite is true for the 60-62. That AND you have the wrap around window with the double hump dash. I secretly wish my 62 was a 63. You can mix and match pretty much any grill/hood/fenders/bed from any 60-66. You also have more options as far as gas tank locations with your frame if you go under the bed. Also, I have to disagree with Wrenchbender about the torsion bars being less practical. You can raise and lower the front end simply by adjusting 2 torsion arm bolts. It doesn't get much more practical. And they work great. They discontinued them to save money. At least that's what I think in my own biased opinion. My 03 AWD Safari has torsion bar IFS . Like it's a new thing. P.S. I had to modify the torsion bar crossmember on my truck to get the O.D. tranny to fit. Wouldn't have been a problem with your frame. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 62 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 62 | I am building a '63 and I agree with all above comments, Decent GM sheet metal is getting rare. if its the right price I would buy a '60-62 just for the sheet metal and stick it on a '63 to '87 rolling chasis. my .02
I see a GM truck in your future!
| | |
| |
| |