The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (BC59, Gray_Ghost), 154 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,079
Posts1,056,058
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#222252 12/19/2006 6:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
P
Junior Member
Junior Member
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Hello,

I like the 1960-1966 style truck but I am partial to the 1960-1963 wraparound winshield. Can anyone offer me advise on which year is easier to make driveline modifications to? What are the pros and cons? My wish list is the big back window, SWB & custom cab. Thank You in advance. Paul

#222253 12/19/2006 6:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 97
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 97
Paul,

I just recently swappd 63 sheetmetal to a 62 frame and vise versa. There are a few differences in mounting locations IE where the front of the cab mounts and where the bed mounts are.

The bigger difference was the front end. The 60-62 uses a tosion bar front end. Depending on what you are doing with the truck one might say the torsion bar is the easier one to modify. You can pull the bar out, rotate it, slide it back in and your truck is lower with out changing spring rates ect.

The 63 and up is on a coil spring between the lower A arm and frame pocket.. If you are planning on bagging the truck, you will more than likely want the 63..

60-62 also has an X frame for added support. I'm guessing for the torsion bar front.

Now most the rears you will come across are a coil set up on a truck arm. GMC I believe was leafs and optional coil but I think Chevy was coil standard.

I hope that helps a little.


Shaun


1963 Chevy P/U: Forged LS1/4L80E swap and big hit of N20 coming
1973 Camaro: Low compression solid roller LS1 with PT91 turbo Built for the Silver State classic
1967 Convert Continental: Stock Cruiser
#222254 12/19/2006 8:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
P
Junior Member
Junior Member
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Thank You! Does the X frame make converting to a V-8/Auto trans swap harder because there is more frame in the way? Is the later larger I6 a unbolt and rebolt swap? There is a '62 that I am considering with very little rust available that is very reasonable. I can spin a wrench but lots of rust I cannot deal with I am not welder/body guy.

#222255 12/19/2006 10:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
I like the 63 up better than the earlier models. The parts are more standardized. Front end parts are rare & pricey for the 60-62. The tortion bar setup was not very practical. That is why GM droped it after 3 years.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
#222256 12/20/2006 2:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 181
K
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 181
The 63-66 had essentially the same front end as the 67-87 4x2 trucks. Makes parts cheap and you can swap in newer disc brakes from the newer ones by changing the ball joints and tie rod ends and addding the new spindle with disc brakes. That makes the choice of a 63 more attractive if you want to keep the wrap around windshield. Swapping in a V8 to a 60-62 shouldn't be a problem. The 'x' brace wasn't in the way of engine/ trans components. Buy the truck, then buy the assembly manual. It's a big help when you want to see how something went together. If you buy the right manual, it covers all 60-66 model PU's.


1965 Chevy C-10 Longbed Stepside
In the Gallery
#222257 12/21/2006 2:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 738
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 738
Shaun,

I own a '61 and personally I think that the 60 and 61 bodystyle is the best. The headlights and grill look much better and so on. I think that torsion bars are great because it made lowering the front end of my truck SUPER easy. I guess that if you haven't bought one yet you still have time to choose. I would definitely get a 60-62 because the wraparound windhield and knee knocker doors kick butt. I guess I am not much help, good luck and welcome!

Kyle


"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." - George S. Patton

My Machine
#222258 12/21/2006 2:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 613
Z
Member
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 613
you can put the 60-61 grills on the later trucks.i did.

#222259 12/21/2006 3:56 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 920
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 920
You have the right truck. It doesn't matter so much for the engine as it does for your chassis. Just check the vendors and EVERYTHING is available for your chassis. Suspension and brake modifications/upgrades are pretty much bolt-ins. But the opposite is true for the 60-62. That AND you have the wrap around window with the double hump dash. I secretly wish my 62 was a 63. You can mix and match pretty much any grill/hood/fenders/bed from any 60-66. You also have more options as far as gas tank locations with your frame if you go under the bed.
Also, I have to disagree with Wrenchbender about the torsion bars being less practical. You can raise and lower the front end simply by adjusting 2 torsion arm bolts. It doesn't get much more practical. And they work great. They discontinued them to save money. At least that's what I think in my own biased opinion. My 03 AWD Safari has torsion bar IFS . Like it's a new thing. P.S. I had to modify the torsion bar crossmember on my truck to get the O.D. tranny to fit. Wouldn't have been a problem with your frame.


1962 Fleetside 4spd 235 w/O.D. posi 3:90
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1990 Subaru Legacy Wagon AWD 2.2 5sp
2013 Ram Tradesman C/V
My Webshot Photos]
#222260 12/21/2006 7:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 62
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 62
I am building a '63 and I agree with all above comments, Decent GM sheet metal is getting rare. if its the right price I would buy a '60-62 just for the sheet metal and stick it on a '63 to '87 rolling chasis. my .02


I see a GM truck in your future!
#222261 12/21/2006 6:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,893
W
Socket Breaker
Socket Breaker
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,893
pncmathias

http://www.stovebolt.com/techtips/buyers_guide_60_66.htm

some of the stuff in that article has already been covered in this thread, but still worth checking out.

-W


Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0