Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
2 members (54farmtruck, 1 invisible),
91
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,157 Posts1,056,875 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 28 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 28 | I was reading Classic Truck mag and there is a full page ad saying that in 2008 a "New Old Truck" is rolling out.What the heck...It's called a Southern ...Looks like a 49 1/2 ton... With all the goodies. That stinks. they can't make them like they did back in AD days. Anyone else see this??? If so what do you think????
Sean
Never Let Them Go
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 183 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 183 | | | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | it is suppose to be built in Liberty S.C. a small town about 75 miles from where I live. I would think there is lots of places to support such a venture with the BMW car plant near by with all its vendors having companies close by but it appears this truck is all special stuff from the hot rod folks/vendors. I would like to have one but not for 55,000. Same thing I said about the Chevy SSR...to pricey for what you get. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 38 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 38 | That is sweeeet!. GM has long fallen out of touch with the average consumer, just take a look at the latest line of GM trucks, and I've always Questioned the SSRs reason for being.
This truck blows it away....Great job Southern!
Rezman
Snapoff brand tools .................................. 1948 Chevy 6400 1949 Chevy 4400 (parts truck)
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 | Looks good, but is all F--d running gear and engine. | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | There's been alot of debate on why the ford driveline. The only real reason that I can determine is that the cost must be lower than using GMs crate engines. Some have theorized that it's about emissions of the feul efficiency hurting GMs ratings. However this would not be the case, as the final manufacturer (Southern) would take the resposibility of emissions, feul economy, and safety concerns, not the component supplier. Case in point-Honda supplies the v6 option for the Saturn Vue. Honda is not responsible for the emissions or feul economy, GM is.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 581 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 581 | I've read that Ford will warranty the drivetrain and service the trucks at dealerships and that GM would not (GM was the first choice). | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 267 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 267 | yep outta touch!they got their money for licencing the body i suppose. it's a political shame,i'm sure. tom
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | I wouldn't count on the ford dealers actually warranteeing a vehicle that they didn't manufacture, unless the dealer actually sells them. It'll be a money losing situation for the dealers.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 339 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 339 | Why would GM want to sell the same engine to a company thats marketing a vehicle thats close in design to vehicles from the past, such as the AD.. Why do most hotrod people use Chevrolet power in their Fords...Hmmmm. BB | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 40 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 40 | I've talked to the guys @ Southern, it is a nice looking truck with all of the modern updates ! They sent me a nice brochure, check them out on line, they seem to have done a good job ! As for the $55m, that does not sound all that bad considering all $$ & TIME THAT I'VE PUT IN MINE ! The paint options are "unlimited" ! My only problem is the drive train, I can't get over the use of a FORD motor in a Chevy (looking) truck ! You would think with all of the Chevy "crate" motors being offered out there (reasonably priced) & the reliability of the small block, that would have been my choice !!!
'53 GMC "Ranger"
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 40 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 40 | SEAN S... Did you see the article in Classic Truck magazine, the Jan. 2007 issue ! If so, they did an article on my truck, see page 86, my wife was shocked, she's gets sarcastick at times with all of the time spent on the makeover... but she does enjoy cruising in her now....go figure !
'53 GMC "Ranger"
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 313 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 313 | Liberty is about 45 miles from me. I usually go to the area on Wednesdays. I'll stop by there to check it out. Here is their website. http://www.southernmotorcompany.com/ | | | | | Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 422 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 422 | labluver, crate engines don't go with factory warranties! As said several times before, in this and another thread... General Motors wouldn't go with using their drive train but Ford did. It will have a warranty and it will be servicable. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 38 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 38 | AD_, I think you nailed it. We're not talking about a crate motor, but rather and entire drive train with computer and harness, all matching components.....Complete. That make a huge difference.
Snapoff brand tools .................................. 1948 Chevy 6400 1949 Chevy 4400 (parts truck)
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 482 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 482 | Looks better than anything I've seen coming out of the big three in many years. If someone working for the big three had an original idea it would be scrubbed in favor of some bizarre concept that tries to be a modern version of an old style. The Southern is definately the work of a lean and independent company. It looks sharp inside and out. Just enough comfort and safety without getting too sissy. Ford wins this contest for thinking outside the box and having the guts to agree to allow their drive train to be installed. I bet they sell every one of those trucks quickly. The price is good considering what it would cost to build a like truck oneself. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 28 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 28 | Yes I did see it in the Classic Truck Mag.
Never Let Them Go
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | I dunno, man.. it looks like a 5 window AD truck with a chopped top to me.
So it's already got 2 strikes against it in my book, and a third strike when I hear it'll feature a Ford engine and drive train.
I'd rather buy a 3 window AD pickup and sit it on an S10 frame with a 4.3 V6 and have a 'real' Chevrolet.
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 90 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 90 | The engines may be Ford but looking through the gallery, the engine shown in the finished truck is indeed a LS small block Chevy. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 200 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 200 | The grill is way cool I hate chopped trucks AD trucks are OK, but not for 55 large the color idea is way cool! Ford components.. Overall---naw-but if they get into Art Decos and come up with something-then we can talk... | | |
| |