Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (GMCJammer51, Hawkman, Guitplayer, Uncles51, Dennys28, walterhvogel, Ponchogl, WICruiser, 1955 1 Series),
55
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,017 Posts1,055,256 Members48,417 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2016 Posts: 56 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: May 2016 Posts: 56 | So, if I want to put ifs on my AD 3100, whats the best route? Are all mustang 2 units the same? some are pretty low cost on ebay. Is s10 any heavier than mustang 2? People talk about using a c10 suspension from early to mid 80's and narrowing the crossmember. Don't the wheels stick out too far? So many options I don't want to get half done and go ,, YUCK! don't care for that. Help please
I just finished a 1946 chevy pickup street rod now on a 1950 chevy 3100 . also a GMC 220 with duals and a 1948 chevy 2 ton | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,440 Bolter | | Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,440 | As you noted, there are several on the market. Total Cost Involved (TCI) and Fatman Fabrications make good kits. If you have never done this before please take the time to research the different manufacturers and read as many blogs and watch UTUBE videos until you are no longer "confused". It is not a weekend project. The S-10 deal usually involves a total frame swap and a special kit for mounting the AD body. The C-10 swap when done properly (narrowing the crossmember) will look just fine but is a lot more work. Good luck with your project. BTW the first thread in this forum will have some valuable information for you. 
Martin '62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress) '47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project) ‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily) ‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence) “I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one! Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop! USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | After some research you may change your mind on the IFS idea. lots and lots of these trucks don't have IFS, and lots and lots of people enjoy driving them. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,189 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,189 | I have to ask, why do you think you need or want IFS? What will you gain? I don't want to sound mean or anything, just asking because as Grigg pointed out above, lots of truck running around still have the OEM suspension and ride just fine. | | | | | Joined: May 2016 Posts: 56 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: May 2016 Posts: 56 | I have a strait axle under my 1946 1/2 ton hot rod, an axle under my 1949 1 tom gmc . I thought it 2 b a nice challenge to try something else
I just finished a 1946 chevy pickup street rod now on a 1950 chevy 3100 . also a GMC 220 with duals and a 1948 chevy 2 ton | | | | | Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,066 Bolter | | Bolter Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,066 | here is a tech tip that may help you ponder what you might want to do click herejust one of many ways to do it, some even use a pacer front susp Redryder pixMy HotrodA veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of "up to and including my life."I am fighting cancer and I am winning the fight | Pain is part of life; misery is an option. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 | We have in shop right now a 49 Studebaker with a Nova clip, a 52 AD with a Nova clip, a 53 Ford with a Volare clip, and a 57 TF with a CE MII clip; all will ride and drive nice with discs and power brakes. With that said my wife's 64 Ford short wide fishing truck with a straight axle also drives straight and true and rides a bit more harsh but it IS a truck. The front axle was completely gone through and along with the shackles and king pins the spring eye bushings, front and rear, were replaced. It has the Toyota p/s box and caster has been increased 4 degrees which lets you drive with no hands on the wheel if necessary---it won't wander. Power drum brakes, a/c, and an automatic lets her seek out fishing holes near and far. Both ways can work just fine.
Evan
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | ....I have a stang II under my 37 and its OK but wish I had the bigger GM rotors.....no problems in 20 years
....I have a 52 Panel with the original straight axle that drives just fine and I have driven it on several Looong trips. I will admit I put power steering in the panel along with a V8 but as far as changing the axle?, nope, its just fine. Just food for thoughts.
...along another line I am not sure who, maybe "tntrknut" (?) that used a 1978 Chevy front clip which, after taking the old axle out, rolled the donor with the independent suspension on the outside of his original chassis. IF, IF I remember correctly he added a 1/2" plate between the it and his chassis. The Chevy may be a 1/2 inch wider on each side but he tells me it drives and runs great and NO ONE has ever noticed or said anything.
**** does any of you remember this??? If I was doing one doggone it, I think it would be an easy, and less expensive, and quicker, to get where Charles wants to go.
Refresh my/our memory someone......Floyd, are you reading this??
Last edited by Achipmunk; 10/07/2017 2:29 AM. Reason: correction
| | |
| |