Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,014 Posts1,055,327 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | My trucks stance is about 3/4 inch lower in the rear I can tell by looking at it and by taking a measurement from center of the well in front and back. Tire pressure the same. Doesn't really bother me, I don't know if its normal or rear springs relaxing. If I wanted to raise the rear by 3/4 or more what would be the best way to accomplish it? Blocks ? Here's a pic Not really noticeable, but I do load it at times with supplies or trips to the land fill. ...pic... ...pic... Thanks for any suggestions. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2013 Posts: 568 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2013 Posts: 568 | Is it leaf spring? The leafs on my 04 dodge relaxed. They de-arch and ride like crap.
I can explain it to you, I can't understand it for you.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | I've always like the rear just a tat lower than the front. I don't like "road sniffers". | | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 | Since the axle is above the leaf springs, blocks will lower the truck further. I have slightly de-arched springs on my 50, but the ride is smoother than my 52 with good springs.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,775 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,775 | | | | | | Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 | Measure from the running boards to the ground front and back with the truck parked on a level surface. It doesn't look lower in the back to me in your 'landfill' pic.
P.S. Who has an indoor landfill??? Must be nice!! | | | | | Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 | Indoor land fill? We got one, dark and smelly. Called a "Transfer Station". The land fill is far away. Give me the sun and some Seagulls any day. You can still pick up nails and screws with the tires so you don't miss the whole experience. The mud is missing..:)
Steve H
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | | | | | | Joined: Aug 2013 Posts: 217 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2013 Posts: 217 | I like my hotrods raked. Thats why bigs and littles were invented! Don't care for tail draggers..... | | | | | Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 | "Road sniffers" and "tail draggers".... new terms are fun. At least these make sense to me.
Steve H
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 2,232 Moderator: Interiors, Texas Bolters, Name that Part | | Moderator: Interiors, Texas Bolters, Name that Part Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 2,232 | Too bad that you don't live closer DADS! I just removed 3 spring on the rear for a smoother ride. I would give them to you. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 2,232 Moderator: Interiors, Texas Bolters, Name that Part | | Moderator: Interiors, Texas Bolters, Name that Part Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 2,232 | I have been sitting here thinking about it....other then stiffening up the ride, which might raise it that way, how is an extra leaf going to raise it up? That would be just like adding a lower block, wouldn't it? That would also put you closer to 1" off in the back in hopes that it strengthens the spring. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Here's the front measurement Here is the rear Measurement taken in the garage, flat surface Aprox 3/4 inch lower in the rear The springs on the 50 now are 4 years old , new stock springs from truck shop in orange. Maybe the rear a little lower is normal? | | | | | Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 | Easy to lower the rear. Not so easy to raise it. Old school method was to put longer shackles on the rear...but it would be quite easy to lower the front. Just add a block under the caster shim and put longer "U" bolts. Might work.
Steve H
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 | Here's the front measurement Here is the rear Measurement taken in the garage, flat surface Aprox 3/4 inch lower in the rear The springs on the 50 now are 4 years old , new stock springs from truck shop in orange. Maybe the rear a little lower is normal? Does the measurement at the running boards show the same difference? To me it doesn't look like it, it just looks like a difference in wheelwell size that you're measuring. Maybe I'm wrong. What about air or overload shocks? They'll give you an extra capacity for your hauling and might raise the back 1/2" | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,513 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,513 | Easy to lower the rear. Not so easy to raise it. Old school method was to put longer shackles on the rear...but it would be quite easy to lower the front. Just add a block under the caster shim and put longer "U" bolts. Might work. The front axle is below the spring pack and the rear is opposite so blocks won't lower the front. I had a similar stance and removed the shortest 2 leafs from the front which dropped the front bumper 1 1/2" and improved the ride too. Removing 1 might be enough to equalize the measurement in this case.
1952 1300 Canadian 1/2 ton restomod You Tube | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Does the measurement at the running boards show the same difference? To me it doesn't look like it, it just looks like a difference in wheelwell size that you're measuring. Maybe I'm wrong. What about air or overload shocks? They'll give you an extra capacity for your hauling and might raise the back 1/2" just measured the running board measurement at the rear of the running board is 1/2 higher than the front of the running board. yes 1/2 higher | | | | | Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,747 | Curt B. you got me. What I meant to say was..easy to lift the front...OOPS! Oh well..I was trying to be positive.
Steve H
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 | These old trucks can be deceiving depending where you look and measure. I tend to measure the boards usually as it's a long expanse that's connected to the front and back fenders, and usually where your eye is visually drawn when looking at stance. That said, in a 60 year old truck things don't always line up as they should and sheet metal isn't always straight anymore (or wasn't to start with).
I try to make sure there's nothing else going on with the box and cab mounting/alignment before I dive into changing the suspension. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Are the rear shackles made of mild steel? ...pic.... Are longer ones available? The ones on my truck measure 5 inches. They are not original If I wanted to make my own to lengthen them, would mild steel flat bar work? ...pic... | | | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 Gas Pumper | | Gas Pumper Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 | Yes. They are mild steel. I have a little experience with this as in my youth I wanted the back end of my car higher. The problem you run into is, the springs will sag just a little more over time. 1 inch longer will only get you about 5/8" higher or so. All things being equal, if your front end is stock, it may be time for a spring replacement. But you can add another few inches to the shackle bars if you want to try it. It WILL work for awhile.
Some of the hot rod shops sell longer ones. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Are the rear shackles made of mild steel? ...pic.... Are longer ones available? The ones on my truck measure 5 inches. They are not original If I wanted to make my own to lengthen them, would mild steel flat bar work? ...pic...The problem you run into is, the springs will sag just a little more over time. how does the spring know | | | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 Gas Pumper | | Gas Pumper Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 | The geometry changes just enough to cause a weak spring to become weaker. A new set of springs will put it back to where it belongs more efficiently, but in the interest of a fix that could last a few years, it won't hurt anything to raise it. That's the best explanation I can come up with why that fix didn't last when I tried it. Maybe someone else with more than anecdotal evidence can explain it? | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Springs were new in 2010
Just want to lift the rear 3/4 inch | | | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 Gas Pumper | | Gas Pumper Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 | I would add another inch then to the shackles then. No hesitation. If the springs are that new, then that should do it. I think they are made out of 3/8" steel. If you make them yourself, there is a taper to the holes that could be difficult. Not sure how necessary that is. I would think there would be a hot rod shop that would offer longer ones or Summit? | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,746 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,746 | If you install longer shackles, put a bolt with a sleeve over it midway between the top and bottom holes. Longer shackles have a tendency to collapse sideways in a tight turn without a center support. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 | OK I'll say it. Your truck looks spectacular in your pictures of the side profile. If you were to show those pictures and ask, "What's wrong with this picture?", I would bet no one would know that there was a problem. Carl
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,609 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,609 | OK I'll say it. Your truck looks spectacular in your pictures of the side profile. If you were to show those pictures and ask, "What's wrong with this picture?", I would bet no one would know that there was a problem. Carl I agree, but I guess he wants a different look? | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Thanks for the comments I have a slight, I believe its due to some wheels that were not made properly. I do ..load... the truck sometimes. When it's loaded I have a slight rubbing issue. Not enough to be a safety issue but I would like to see if I give the truck an even stance, it might help. ...pic... ...pic... I realize this is not the proper way to accomplish this Thought I would give it a shot. Thanks for the tip on the carriage bolt sleeve I'm thinking ill increase the length by 1 inch to 1 1/4 max At the slight angle of the rear schackle should give me the lift? Anyone know of a kit?, otherwise ill look through the scrap bin at work for the 3/8 x2 inch flat plate. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Another thought I had was to make a shim and place between the mount and frame ...?.... My mounts have bolts | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,971 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,971 | Another thought I had was to make a shim and place between the mount and frame ...?.... My mounts have bolts Old tires make good shims. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 | Another thought I had was to make a shim and place between the mount and frame ...?.... My mounts have bolts That would make all of the height difference in the world without changing the complex geometry involved with lengthening the shackles. When you just lengthen the shackles by 1 inch, you do not gain 1 inch of lift at all loads due to spring action forcing the shackles rearward, eliminating any of your desired lift. I would use steel shims between the frame and the mounts. Carl
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 Gas Pumper | | Gas Pumper Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 3,399 | If you have bolts holding the mount that's on the frame, wow, yeah, do that instead. All of the ones I have seen are riveted to the frame. Thats a nice idea. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2018 Posts: 6 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jun 2018 Posts: 6 | I'm going to resurrect this old post to see if DADS50 can tell me how he ended up resolving his rear shackle issue. I've got the same issue on a '52 3100 I recently purchased (Rear wheel well opening 1 1/4" lower than front and rear of running board 1" lower than front).
I was going to make longer shackles as discussed previously here. Does anyone know the taper of the holes in the side pieces on the shackle so I can make them prior to disassembly?
Thanks Terry
1952 Chevy 3100
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 | "(Rear wheel well opening 1 1/4" lower than front and rear of running board 1" lower than front)."
I need to know what in the world this statement means. No offense. I may not be familiar with your regional dialect. Please break it down for me. "Rear wheel well opening." Where exactly are you measuring from on the wheel well? Are you measuring from this point on the wheel well to the ground? That is all I can ask about until you can clarify the rest of your statement above.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2014 Posts: 678 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2014 Posts: 678 | I've got the same issue on a '52 3100 I recently purchased (Rear wheel well opening 1 1/4" lower than front and rear of running board 1" lower than front). Terry FYI, the wheel openings on AD trucks are NOT the same height front and rear. The front wheel openings are higher (presumably so the tire has room to steer), the rears lower. If you make the wheel openings the same height the truck will have a slight forward rake. The running board measurement is a good criterion for leveling. I usually put an angle finder on the horizontal part to measure my rake angle in degrees. Okay DADS50, your turn...
1951 Chevy Panel Truck
| | |
| |