Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,083 Posts1,055,967 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 17 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 17 | Hey Guys, I'm in the process of a ground up restoration on a '49 chevy truck, and I'm a little concerned about the ride height. I'm doing a restification, so it's pretty much stock looking, but minor mods. I do not have plans to lower it at this time. I'm doing the truck piece by piece, so the chassis is done, motor is in place, and box(without fenders) is back on. When I got the box on, it seems really high in the air. There is a 2" difference from the front of the running board to the back. What kind of rake do you8 guys have on a stock(ish) truck? | | | | | Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 64 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 64 | Mine appeared that way also. Once your fenders lights bumper and bed wood is in it will weight it down and you should be about 1 inch different. Fenders make a considerable amount of difference in look once on since they drop so far down. The rear shackles are about 3/4 of an inch difference in length. I used front shackles in the rear to level it out for the most part. Get it all together before making any decisions on changes. You may be happy with it as is. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 17 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 17 | Thanks Yellow52. I have the bed wood in there, and one of the fenders on, and the bumper, but still, there's a 2" diff between front and rear of the running board. Also, The fender seems to be riding about 6" above the wheel. Granted, I don't have a cab on yet, but that should impact front and back equally, and front sheet metal might even make it look worse. I'll wait until I get the truck all together, but just seeing what I am up against. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | all of these trucks are noticeably higher in the tail from the factory, they were made to carry a load, put a thousand pounds in the bed and see what happens .... if you plan on never carrying a load, wait until it's all back together before you consider if the looks are a problem Bill | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 17 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 17 | Yeah, it's just funny. You don't see many of these that aren't lowered these days, so I think I was just freaking myself out. agree to wait until all the sheet metal is hung, and I don't mind if she's a little higher in the rear. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,750 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,750 | Larry,i'm not sure if this helps but here's a good side profile shot of my '50 One thing to bear in mind,there's NO engine and trans in it,apart from that it was exactly as Chevrolet intended. I imagine with the engine and transmission installed it would drop the nose a touch. 1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in ScotlandIn the Stovebolt GalleryMore pix on Flickr. I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | Larry, I suppose your keeping the stock rearend. Keep in mind that over the years some trucks were worked harder than others and sometimes loads may have sit on the springs for a long time and the springs got weak which lowered some in the back more than others. For what its worth, I've never been a big fan of "road sniffers".
I'm running stock front and rear springs on my panel and when I put 15" 6 lug wheels on it there was a nice difference than with the tall 16" wheels....
...I think some folks may remove a spring or two, or "every other one" to get a softer lower ride but I'm not sure.
I think the guys have gave good advice. Wait and see!! | | | | | Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,596 | I was doing much the same working on my '46 GMC this weekend, concerned about ride height before all the weight is on the suspension. Wait until you get the body on the truck, then you can worry about the ride height. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 64 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jun 2012 Posts: 64 | Also check to see if you have some additional springs or over loads added. or even longer shackles. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 4,095 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 4,095 | mine for what it is worth. . lowered and i like a level ride. the fabricator had a forward rake and i had it changed.
Last edited by WE b OLD; 07/05/2012 1:34 AM.
Ron, The Computer Greek I love therefore I am.1954 3100 Chevy truckIn the Gallery 2017 Buick Encore See more pix1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
| | |
| |