The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 247 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,094
Posts1,056,066
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#74735 03/13/2007 5:22 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 649
Y
'Bolter
'Bolter
Y Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 649
Hello Stovebolters, need some help, I have a rear axle housing from 81 Camaro with 2.41 ratio. Question: I intend to run a 350/350, with 215/70/15 or 225/70/15 tires. This is going to be a daily driver, but still would prefer power over mileage. Another option I have is use a S-10 T-5 transmission. So just wanted to know if anyone else has had any experience with the "tall" gear set up and what do you think? Thanks in advance.
Phil

#74736 03/13/2007 3:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,212
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,212
Do a check of the web for gear ratio calculator. There are a lot of them out there. Just feed your numbers in them and see what happens. Also, what trans did the Camero have? What tire size did it have? Joe

#74737 03/13/2007 4:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
That '81 Camaro was probably a 350/350 or maybe a 305/350. What are you building and how will it be different than the Camaro?

Assuming you're working on an old truck performance is going to be similar to the Camaro with the same engine mods and tires.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
#74738 03/13/2007 4:33 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
Here is the calculator I like.
http://www.drivetraindirect.com/t_gear_calculator.htm

I use it to find rear axle and overdrive ratios that work together to give me the cruising down the interstate speed I want at an RPM that gives the engine the best economy and a long life.

If you find a transmission that works well with the rear ratio you have you can still have the lower gears needed to race from light to light, and the top gear for good fuel mileage.
Grigg


•1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
•1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
•1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#74739 03/13/2007 4:36 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
Quote
Originally posted by OldSub:
you're old truck performance is going to be similar to the Camaro with the same engine mods and tires.
True, if the weight of both are close.

If your truck is much heaver you may want lower gears in the rear to help haul the extra weight.

Grigg


•1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
•1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
•1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#74740 03/13/2007 4:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
I would think that 2:41 would be OK with a 350 or any other 1 to 1 tranny.But with an overdrive unit you would need to go somewhere around a 3:73 gear.I am running a 350 SB,and 700R4 OD tranny,with 3:90 gears.It gets decent performance and gets 20 MPG all day long.I am sure you will get other opinions here,but that is how I would go.

#74741 03/13/2007 5:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Quote
Originally posted by Grigg:
if the weight of both are close
Yeah I rashly assumed a 1/2-ton pickup that's not likely to weigh even as much as a bloated Camaro, but is also unlikely to weigh a lot less.

I made that assumption in part because if its a bigger truck that Camaro rear is a mistake...


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
#74742 03/13/2007 6:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 874
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 874
I've had an '81 Z28 since I was 19. It came stock with 350/350 and 3.08 gears. It weighs pretty close to 3600 pounds. Base coupes were a few hundred pounds lighter and Berlinettas were in between.

Advance Design 1/2 ton pickups weigh approx. 3100 lbs. Suburbans: 3600 +-, 3/4 ton pickups: 3480 +-
Weights vary slightly from year to year.


Steve

'49 3800
'52 3600
'57 3100

#74743 03/13/2007 7:13 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
Sounds like they are about the same weight. I just assumed a sporty car would weigh less than a pickup.
Grigg


•1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
•1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
•1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#74744 03/13/2007 8:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
I think it would be geared too high. The o-drive would be useless. I run a 350 with 700-4r & 3.08 rear end in my 70 stepside. It is just right but could not handle anything higher.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
#74745 03/13/2007 9:05 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 74
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 74
I'm going to run 350 w/ T400 tranny and 3.08 rear end. Given the calculator I've used on Randy's Ring and Pinion web site, I should be cruising right along at about 2200 rpm's at highway speeds. Looking forward to getting the differential put on the truck.


Paul
1956 Chevy Task Force Webshots
My wife puts knots on my head faster than I can rub 'em. That's why I ask knot-headed questions.
#74746 03/14/2007 3:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,212
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,212
I run a 250 six with a 350 trans 3.08 gear and 235/75R15 tires, mine gets 18 to 19 mpg and can run 70 mph all day long. Its a little slow pulling a trailer but still gets down the road! Joe

#74747 03/15/2007 3:57 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
Well, with those gears you are definetly on the economy side. I would think you would find it difficult to pull a load, or climb a grade. If you ever plan to use it like a truck, you would want to get a lower geared rear end. 3.08 without overdrive, or 3.55 - 4.11 with overdrive should give you "the power" that you are looking for.

#74748 03/15/2007 2:49 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
Quote
I would think that 2:41 would be OK with a 350 or any other 1 to 1 tranny.But with an overdrive unit you would need to go somewhere around a 3:73 gear.
3.08, 3.40 or 3.73....... 2.4 is pretty highly geared
you'll be great on the freeway but hills may be interesting..
my.02


Jim & Caroline
The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense."
Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
#74749 03/15/2007 4:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
Think about the gears themselves too. With a 2.41, even a 3.08, the gears themselves get pretty thin. If you ever want to haul anything, it will be a dog, and the gears have a lot more strain on them (not as strong).

My 327, 2 speed automatic with 3.73 gears will haul and go 75mph. Gas mileage takes a crap at those speeds, but I can take off pretty good too. Mileage around town is going to suffer with too high ratio also.

2.41 IMHO is way to high.

#74750 03/16/2007 5:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 364
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 364
Hard to believe you have a 2.41 in a Camaro...most V8 Camaros had 3.40 and up rears. With that high a ratio you'll be lucky to get up your driveway and you'll certainly never get that motor going enough to use any OD gear...that's a true flatland only gear!


Steve G.
--------------
1942 Chevrolet 1/2-Ton Pickup Truck


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0