| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,192 Posts1,057,350 Members48,469 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 43 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 43 | My 62 305 has one of these on the factory 3 speed..anyone know anything about these? doing a V8 swap and need to know if it can handle a 350 or if i need to replace it. Suggestions?
62' GMC SWB Fleetside
Why can't we just go back to the designs from when cars were unique and didn't all look the same?
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | You mean a hydraulic clutch? Sure it will handle a 350, most modern trucks all have a hydraulic clutch slave to disengage the clutch,
Scott | | | | | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 1,522 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 1,522 | Made me think of my '50 Dodge or Plymouth with Fluid Drive.
Very weird set-up. But, back in 68, everything was kind weird. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 164 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 164 | my 62 GMC 4000 fire engine with a 351 V6 has a hydraulic clutch and it works great. and NAPA still has the parts for a good price. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 192 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 192 | Don't know if this helps but my '61 half ton has the slave set up and a 327 engine. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 109 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 109 | My 65 C-80 with the 409 has a hydraulic clutch, how stout do you need it?
'65 C-10, 65 L-60, 65 C-80, 72 C-60 & and a bunch of old Chevy cars.
Never time to do it right, always time to do it over.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 43 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 43 | stout enough to handle 400-450 ft.lbs and about 450 hp tops..any way to beef them up? or do i just need to get an entirely new clutch?
62' GMC SWB Fleetside
Why can't we just go back to the designs from when cars were unique and didn't all look the same?
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 109 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 109 | All the hydraulics does is move the throw out bearing. It has nothing to do with how much torque the clutch will handle.
'65 C-10, 65 L-60, 65 C-80, 72 C-60 & and a bunch of old Chevy cars.
Never time to do it right, always time to do it over.
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 926 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 926 | BTW-when I replaced the six in my first '62 with a V-8,I found the clutch fork was on the other side of the bell housing. If your bell housing doesn't have the built in pad for the slave cylinder(for V-8/mechanical clutch linkage),it's easy to make one from a little piece of angle bolted to the two upright inspection cover bolts behind the oil filter;drill and thread two holes in it to match the slave cylinder holes. The clutch fork from either V-8 or six set up will work fine. It'll be plenty strong;mine lasted through 3 engines. The hose will be too long;you can either route it to use up the extra length or replace it with a shorter one. I just ran mine up the firewall and back down to the slave cylinder with a loop in it,because it worked fine and I didn't wanna have to open the system and have to re-bleed it,and because I'm too cheap to buy another line.
Speed
| | |
|
|
| |
