The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Otto Skorzeny, Paul_WNC, 3B, 3 invisible), 65 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,082
Posts1,056,324
Members48,442
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#651368 06/01/2010 7:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
Had a chance to pick up a split exhaust manifold for my 235". If I do nothing else to the engine, will I notice a bit better performance with dual exhaust? Logic says yes, but technically?


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton
"Sedgewick"
In the Gallery
1989 Caprice
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
I can't lay my hands on dyno results for a 235, but in the May 1955 HRM article about Frank McGurk's dyno test on a 261 , he measured about a 5% improvement in peak torque and horsepower by installing a Corvette six exhaust manifold on an otherwise stock 261. The improvement on a 235 might be slightly less. As I recall, another HRM article in 1953 reported about a 3% improvement in peak HP by installing a split manifold on a 216 with dual carbs and some other mods.

Hoyt

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
I put my 235 build through the DeskTop Dyno computer program and it came back as 170 HP. I don't really believe that but some of my more knowledgeable Inliner friends say it isn't far off. Well whatever. I just know that time spent on the heads milling and porting is time well spent. Then do the intake and exhaust bit along with a little better cam and carbs and there you are. Don't forget the ignition, it is a big improvement.

I have seen 302' Jimmy's put out about 700hp naturally aspirated. Probably worked out to about $1000 per hp, HA. But darn that thing would go.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
HP gain from 'split' stock manifold would be minimal when compared to custom headers or Fentons. You may want to check with Patrick's in AZ for more info.
www.patricksantiquecars.com


It's easier to get forgiveness than permission!
1946 1/2-Ton Chevy
1953 Chevy 3/4-ton Factory Stakebed
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 487
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 487
I'll have an opinion tomorrow.
I have a dyno appointment for 10:00 Saturday morning.
I've added a Corvette exhaust manifold and a pair of 22" Smithy's to my otherwise stock 55 235. I got 81 HP in stock trim.

regards,
Leon

Last edited by Leon; 06/04/2010 8:52 PM.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,388
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,388
It will sound cool! Duals and cherry bombs sound nice.


Christopher
1950 1-Ton
"Rochester"
In the Gallery
In the DITY Gallery

1949 GMC Panel Truck
1926 Model TT Truck
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
302' Jimmy's put out about 700hp naturally aspirated

I assume that's with 400 hp nitrous?

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 487
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 487
I got my Dyno results.
The 235 with the Corvette manifold made a max of 87 HP and 176 ft-lbs of torque.
That's a gain of 6 HP or about 7% over the stock configuration. Pretty close to the McGurk report.
Here's a chart.

YMMV.

regards,
Leon

Last edited by Leon; 06/05/2010 10:40 PM.
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
No Panic it's actually a very custom built race engine including an aluminum 12 port head and more goodies thanI can list. It also is the world record holder for the 1/4 mile in dragster form. Belongs to a friend of mine and it doesn't have nitrous but it does use nitro fuel. Hard to belive I know. But is also has been bored to 320 cubes so that helps a little I suppose.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
Leon,

Good work and good results. Thanks for running the tests and sharing the results. Does anyone have similar results on a split manifold and Fenton headers? The conventional wisdom is that the Corvette six manifold is better than a split, but that the Fentons are better than the Corvette.

Hoyt

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
it doesn't have nitrous but it does use nitro fuel

As I said...

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Not the same thing. Anyway if you choose not to believe it that is fine by me. As I said, I understand its difficult to accept.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
It's not "difficult to accept".
Nitrous oxide and nitro-methane are not the same substance, but for racing purposes nitro is an even stronger power adder (see Pro Mod rules).
My point is that you accidentally forgot to mention that tiny little detail (gasoline is not the fuel), as if it were of no consequence. My objection is that the conclusion you permitted to be drawn from your remark is (since all prior remarks dealt with pump gas) that a N/A GMC engine produced 700 hp on gas.
Anything over 350 would be quite remarkable.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0