Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,120 Posts1,056,649 Members48,450 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 33 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 33 | OK so sometime in the near future i want to do the T-5 swap in my 55 first, what later model rear should i use? What ratio am i looking for?
Thanks
- Zach Morris
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 874 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 874 | I'd use the one you got. Others may have different opinions. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2000 Posts: 784 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2000 Posts: 784 | I agree. I'm running a T5 with a 3.90 '55 rear end in my 46. A good combination. George | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | I agree the original is fine. If you go to a stronger engine like a 350 v-8 You might want to go to a 3.55. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,317 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,317 | There are a few factors you need to consider before selecting a particular T5 model and a ring and pinion ratio to match.
Most importantly, you want your final setup to optimize your engines potential and to fit your driving style. In my particular case, I have a built, low-end torque 235 engine coupled to a 1985 NWC .72 OD T5 turning a 88 Camaro 3.42 R&P and running a 28" tall rear tire. My truck cruises at 70 mph at 2000 rpms and it is a daily driver. My particular .72 OD came from behind a 2.8L V-6 truck.
This particular combo lets me drop down to 45 mph in 5th gear without a downshift, and accelerate with traffic. In all honesty, and after putting on 5000 miles, I would have been a bit happier to have had a R&P ratio in the 3.55 to 3.73 range. It cruises fine at 55-65 mph at 16-1700 rpm range, but my vacuum gauge tells me she would be more efficient at closer to 2400 rpms at 60-65mph. With fuel economy an issue today, the shorter R&P ratios might be just the ticket, especially if you like to putz along, or are in real hilly country.
The T5's come in several OD ratios...the .72 and .86 are common for the Non-World (NWC) class S10 boxes. Also the Pre-89 boxes are set up for a mechanical speedo while the later T5's are for electronic speedos. My 3.76 1st gear has me shifting at about 15 mph....the .86 OD NWC T5 from behind the 2.5L 4 cylinder with a 4.03 1 st gear would drop the 1st gear shift point even lower. I consider my .72 box to be an ideal setup.....3.42's Camaro diffs (62" wide) are plentiful while the 3.73's are a little more scarce.
Of course, there is another option with the World Class (WC) T5's that are found behind the 305 SBC Camaro. You didn't mention what your engine size was going to be....the NWC T5 would be fine behind the 235-261. If you're running a stock 350, the WC T5 would be okay for normal driving applications. However, you will need to change out the tailshaft to the shorter NWC S10 version to get proper location for your floor shifter. Also getting the speedo "drive" gear located on the output shaft so that you can have a speedo, takes some special effort. The gear ratios are a little closer together but by the time you pay for the WC box, the short tailshaft housing and get the speedo drive gear properly positioned, the NWC S-10 T5 will be your least costly and less difficult install.
I've got a fairly comprehensive photo documentation of my T5 install in my Webshots albums "Shoebox" and "Tips and Tricks." It will outline all of the modifications you'll have to make and I've documented the process with pictures.
Upgrading to an overdrive transmission has transformed my truck into a great driving machine that utilizes the full potential of the 235 engine. I've done most all of the R&D to getting it installed and after 5K without any problems, I'd highly recommend the upgrade.
Dave
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | someone explain to me....again, what the difference is in world class and NON world class. I read it awhile back but can't remember! | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | The WC is stouter. It came in Camero's & mustangs. The big difference is the brgs. on the countershaft. Some of the gears are stronger. The WC use a Milar coating on the syncro's. Ive worked on both & havn't seen a lot of difference. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | | | |
| |