The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (Phak1, CharlieF, Peggy M, klhansen), 56 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,153
Posts1,056,842
Members48,456
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224

65 c-10 swb. its got the original tired 283 that im wanting to replace. it will basically just be a cruiser, so i want to have an automatic in it plus an engine that would give me the best mpg. now i have in mind a 250, but ive read alot of posts with people boasting 20 to 23 mpg with a 350/700r4 setup with good highway gears.

my question: with good highway gears and a 250/700r4, what could i expect for mpg and power? i want to have a bit of towing power, but still go 70+ mph down the highway without a load. yes ive thought of the 292, but i really wanna bring the mpg down as much as possible. now 20mpg sounds great to me, could a 250 achieve better or is this all wishful thinking?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
I,ve got a 350/700-4R in my 70 & i,ve tuned & tuned & can,t get over 18 at best. My 58 with the same engine & T-5 seems to do better but I have never driven it enough to really tell. I think a 250 would be very sluggish.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
I don't think a 250 will get any milage with a 700R4, the torque curve is not what it needs to be at 1700 t0 1900 rpm. You will be better off with a 350 with a stock type cam. A 292 will do better then the 250 and should be about equal to the 350 in milage. Of course the 350 will out power both of them. Just look back at what the factory used and go from there.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Rebuild the 283 for the correct answer.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
I agree with 53moneypit. The 283 and a 700r would be a nice combo if mileage is what you are looking for. Stick a nice 2 barrel on it and run it.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 131
S
Certified Bolt Nut
Certified Bolt Nut
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 131
I've got a used 250 I would be happy to swap for your sluggish 283! If you don't use it of course... 8-)

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
thanks for the input every body, i really appreciate it. good advice, i was afraid of having to go the normal v8/700r4 combo but i guess people go that way for a reason. just like those inline 6's so much.......


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0