The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Patina 54, Cosmo, RoadsScholar, 2 invisible), 177 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,087
Posts1,055,976
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#29915 05/07/2005 8:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94
I've heard it said that if you want to go with a multi-carb setup on your engine, then the number of carbs should be based on the number of cylinders to get the best performance. For example, a 6 cylinder should have either 3 or 6 carbs.

Has anyone else heard this? If this is true, then why?? I know that there are hundreds if not thousands of dual-carb setups on Chevy 6's out there. Would the addition of a third carb make that much more difference on a 6?

Inquiring minds want to know.
Thanks

#29916 05/07/2005 10:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
I've never heard that, at least until now. My suspicion is that it is an old wives tale from the days when understanding airflow through the manifold was not a science but more smoke and mirrors. In that scenario one carb for each set of intake ports probably made sense to some. Todays intakes work a lot better and one 390 CFM 4bbl works really well. 3 & 6 carbs have linkage and firewall clearance problems on a lot of cars & trucks and that is a real good reason to avoid them but the WOW factor is lost too.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
#29917 05/08/2005 4:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,782
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,782
One man/one vote, and one engine/one carb! Some things are just too good to tinker with! If you want the geewhiz factor, get a 3-carb manifold, and put blind gaskets under the outboard carbs. Then you can have the reliability of a single and the looks of a triple setup. The time, effort amd MONEY you'll spend making a multi-carb setup work, some of the time, can be spent doing more enjoyable things!
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
#29918 05/08/2005 9:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 42
M
Apprentice
Apprentice
M Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 42
On a practical level, I have to agree with Hotrod Lincoln on this one. My truck has a 283 (2-bbl Rochester, ram horn manifolds, etc), and everything you read about these engines basically boils down to "for street use, put on a 500-600cfm 4-bbl carb, headers if you want, and away you go." So on that basis, I should go find the manifold/carbs/cylinder heads from the 283 "power pack" and call it a day.

On the romantic / inspiration side, though: Every time I open the hood, I see the Rochester 2G sitting there on the motor but, in my head, I see three Stromberg 97s. I have spent too much time looking at tri-power setups on hoodless hot rods to really want anything else, in the long run--even for a driver/hauler truck that will never see a race track. And I think this way even after hearing horror stories from a friend of mine with a Corvair about syncing his carbs. I figure it's only a matter of time!


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0