The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (rfs56trk, Hotrod Lincoln, dgrinnan, Otto Skorzeny), 108 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,164
Posts1,056,968
Members48,458
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 29
W
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
W Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 29
I see requests for S-10 longbed frames in various parts of the board. Even saw one where the guy was lengthening the frame some. And then I see discussions about this front end clip or that front end clip etc. So which is the best way to go?

Seems to me the S-10! Suspension is already worked out, you just have to make mounting brackets for the cab. Although not trivial, doesn't appear at first glance to be as complicated as adding a front clip to the existing frame. Besides you get the possibility of having a modern drivetrain too, gas tank location, plumbing etc. all done for you.

Hince the question which is the best way to go?

By the way I have a high mileage '93 S-10, small V6 with T5 tranny, all in good shape. Engine needs a rebuild. Not that big a deal. Kind of a 'bird in the hand' type situation smile . 'course I don't have the AD truck yet. Still looking. Have a line on a '51 5 window, very rusty, would need a new bed, etc.

Wade

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
personal preference is the answer.

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
The best way to go is keep it a truck. If you want modern suspension and ride get a modern vehicle.


"It's just a phase. He'll grow out of it." Mama, 1964

1956 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
1953 Chevy 6100 "The Yard dog"
1954 GMC Suburban Now with a new proud owner.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
If you want leaf springs in the rear and IFS in the front I think the S-10 is a good option. But if you are happy with rear leaf you have to ask why not use the orginal frame.

There are lots of reasons not to do a clip, and doing a search here will probably find you a few hundred of them so I won't try to repeat them.

My responses sound like I'm against making the change. I'm not, but I think its very important to know why you are making such a significant change before tackling the project.

I always want someone to tell me what they think 'best' means before trying to tell them what is best for them.

I'm working on five different truck projects and on two of them I'm planning to use the orignal frames. I think I have the best plan for each and that gives me a different answer on each project.

You really want to think through how you want to use the truck and how you want it to perform before making this kind of decision. If you want an S-10 that looks like an AD truck the S-10 swap might very well be your best approach.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 677
1
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
1 Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 677
here is a website called advanced-design engineering www.ad-engineering.com check this out it awsome ! this is the way im going to go with my 51 3100 after doing lots of looking its the only way !!


Some people are like Slinkies, Their not really good for nothing... But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.

1951 3100 350 TBI Gallery Toddzilla... "$old"


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
Same questions Ive been asking, except an art deco has a 115 inch WB. None of the s-10's match that. A dodge dakota is real close though.

Advantages are having modern stuff under old sheet metal. Much safer, especially when running an 8 banger engine..

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
There are always different opinions, but the modern brakes and suspension, gas tank position etc...as mentioned before, all contribute to the positive side.
Im gonna keep searching till I get all of the answers i need before i make a purchase of any frame, but if you buy a longer frame and cut it down, you would then have to cut the drive shaft, and the other area is width...on an art deco a half ton rear axle goes to 59-60 inches on the original frame, so we would have to know the same for the swapped frame rearend, or switch it with a better one.

Much thanks to Bill gervais for sending me those charts and measurements..thanks Bill.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
I am quite happy with my original front solid axle. My ride is good and it works. I think GM spent a lot of time engineering things to work in harmony on these trucks and as a result I am staying with their decisions.
The S-10 conversion kit that is available is very good. If I just wanted IFS I would go with an aftermarket IFS kit rather than try to weld a subframe from something else on the front of my truck.


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton
"Sedgewick"
In the Gallery
1989 Caprice
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
Its whatever is right for you.I used a TCI M2 frontend on my 55 2nd and I am very happy with it.Course every year the price goes up on these units,but it is by far the easiest way to go.Seems to me if you go the front clip,(Camaro) route you will probably have to rebuild everything,same with an S10 frame.So in the long run there wont be much difference in the cost.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
On a stock AD the rear tires are located forward in the rear fender. The 117" wheelbase of the S10 puts the rear tire in the exact center of the wheel opening--looks much better.


Evan
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
From coilover
Quote
On a stock AD the rear tires are located forward in the rear fender. The 117" wheelbase of the S10 puts the rear tire in the exact center of the wheel opening--looks much better.
Which S-10 has the 117 inch wheel base? I got 2 numbers. One for 108.3 inch wheel base(2001 model-regular cab) and the extended cab at 122.9 inch wheel base.(2001 model ext. cab)

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
3
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
3 Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
save a lot of work stay away from rusty ones my vote is use a bolt in front end from a 75 chevy truck

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
Toomany2count-thanks tons brother-good stuff.. cool

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 37
4
Apprentice
Apprentice
4 Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 37
As said before, personal preference is the final answer as this subject can be argued with both sides having good reasons. I used the S10 under my 49 because I wanted a daily driver and I had no useable frame with my truck purchase and the S10 was available cheap. I did completely rebuild the front end because it is an '85. Also used the AD Engineering kit to save alot of time in fabrication although it drives the cost up. It is on the road now and drives great and I'm happy to have gone this route.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
49S10 could you post some pictures of your truck? I'd like to see the finished stance, the engine compartment, and any pictures of how things look underneath.

If you don't have a place to host the pictures please email them directly to me. I'll put them on the web where others can see them if its okay with you. I'll host as many pictures of the build as you can send me.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 37
4
Apprentice
Apprentice
4 Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 37
Oldsub-
I'll take some in the next day or so and email to you.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Thanks 49S10! I'll look forward to receiving them.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
49s10-I would like to see those pictures as well. can you e-mail them to me?

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4
S
Junior Member
Junior Member
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4
I am deciding this as well. Here are my thoughts:

1) An S10 swap doesn't involve major frame fabrication. Installing a clip takes precise measurements and good welding. Let's face it, it has to be perfect.
2)There are V8 swap kits for S10's, a Camaro or "G" clip may have a V8 already. A V8 install in an aftermarket IFS and AD frame could take major fabrication again.
3) Aftermarket IFS kits are expensive and imagine trying to buy parts for it? Eg: A spindle for a 85 S10 or 79 Camaro is easy to find.
4) An S10 frame with an AD body; is it an S10 or an AD truck? An original frame with IFS kit has that certain cool factor.
5) Lowering or adding airbags to an S10 frame could be done with aftermarket S10 parts.
6) A rolling chassis for an S10 is $500 from an autowrecker here, a front clip is about the same price.

I am starting with a 3600 long box, and will be a short box. In this case, I would have to add a front clip, and shorten the frame. S10 frame is looking the way to go for me.


1948 3600 (I think) Sat in the bush for over 30 years until I rescued it.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Saved-- A few responses.

An S-10 swap is either buy the AD-Engineering kit or fabricate body mounts included the radiator mount required to hang the grill and fenders.

The aftermarket V-8 engine mount available for the stock frame is pretty straight-forward and NOT a big fabrication project.

The aftermarket IFS kits are usually based on an OE IFS and many of the parts can be bought at a local parts store, or Ford dealer. Most kits are based on Mustang II stuff, others use GM or Chrysler parts.

Is it an S-10 or an AD? If you call it an S-10 people are going to be confused. I'd call it an AD truck and only mention the S-10 stuff when buying suspension parts.

Running a dropped straight axle is more cool than any IFS option.

Just my thoughts on reading yours... Take them for whatever you think they are worth.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0