The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (DadsFirstPickup, baldeagle, 1 invisible), 140 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,087
Posts1,056,114
Members48,435
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#201692 02/20/2006 7:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 63
Z
ZB3
Offline
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
Z Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 63
I appreciate the replys on the v8 vs 235. I am going to sell the camaro and put in the 235. Next question is: Is the ifs much better riding for the cost vs the leaf springs? I would like to hear from the 'bolters who have had experience with both. Does the ifs set the truck too low for the ocasional trip to the fishing hole (gravel and dirt roads)? How easy is it for an aspiring mechanic to put in? Thanks again, Wayne

#201693 02/20/2006 8:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,682
F
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
F Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,682
Dudes going with IFS usually do so because they:

1. Wanna make things easier for power steering (or steering in general when putting in a V8)

2. Want front disc brakes for better stopping power (usually after adding a v8)

3. Want to slam, or at least lower, the vehicle from stock height.

I've driven a few AD trucks with IFS, but all have had a v8 in them.. haven't ever driven an IFS modded truck that still had a 235 or 216 in them.

IFS sure makes a heck of a difference in handling and drive over the stock front suspension.. makes the truck handle more like a 20 year old truck than a 40+ year old one! But personally, i've come to love the way my old trucks feel and ride.. so unless I had a reason to go with disc brakes (see #2 above), I probably wouldn't hassle with it.

All the IFS trucks i've seen have been lower than stock height.. not sure if that's 'nature of the beast' or just one of the common things for folks to do when they switch.


an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
#201694 02/20/2006 8:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 571
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 571
You can buy a disc brake kit for your straight axle from various vendors. But after you rebuild the entire stock front end of that 52 with new disc brakes, tie rod ends, king pins and drag link, (which it prolly needs) you will have just as much in it as an IFS. I think if I did it all over again, I would try the IFS. I like the lower stance and it just doesn't work well with the stock axle. I have not tried a stock dropped axle which are now available. Lot of work rebuilding the original too. Got to have a special reamer to do the king pins I hear. Good Luck with whatever you decide. wink

#201695 02/21/2006 8:10 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 990
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 990
I stayed stock because I have a 1 ton and I didn't want to lose the load rating. I used kevlar brake pads and they work very well. Drives like a truck tho...

#201696 02/21/2006 11:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 388
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 388
I stayed with the drop stock axle mainly for looks and origionatily. Put disk brk frt end , new king pins,lost a few leafs and went with 15" wheels. Love tha look. will drive it everyday possible.Good Luck, bowties

#201697 02/21/2006 1:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
i have a pacer IFS and i like it but if i had available then what is available now i might have stayed with stock set up, power steering kits, and disc brake kits and so on. ron


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
#201698 02/28/2006 5:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
R
Junior Member
Junior Member
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
I used a Pacer clip, as some others here have. I’ve always been happy with the results. (Although it’s in pieces all over the garage now as I try to get it all rebuilt before spring.) There wasn’t much to choose from 15-16 years ago when I put it in. Never cared for the Pinto/Mustang II kits, as they seem too narrow for the AD chassis. But I would use this if I were going to do it now… http://www.chassisengineeringinc.com/page9.html
The bolt in design, available engine mounts, 2” adjustment of ride height, and they fixed the width problem. Looks like a well thought out kit to me.

(ps…This is not an ad for that company, just my opinion on the subject)


Later...
1950 Chevy 3100
1953 Hudson Hornet
#201699 02/28/2006 11:10 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 926
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 926
I stuck with the stock front end on my '57 GMC for a few reasons:
I was pulling a 35 foot 5th wheel RV trailer a lot,and didn't find much that had the load capacity for it.
All the ifs kits I checked out would have lowered the front by at least 4 inches,and I like the ride height as it is.
Expensive.
I donn't want a cushy ride in my truck;if I want to drive something cushy,I'll drive my station wagon.
Simplicity;easier,and less expensive to work on.
Better ground clearance-a pretty big deal for me as I do a lot of driving on bad roads,or no roads.
It's all a matter of personal preference. I just happen to prefer my trucks to act like trucks.
Speed


1954 GMC 350
1957 GMC 1/2 ton
1962 Chevy C-30
1952 Chevy 6400 dump bed project truck
'98 Harley FLSTC
'66 Pontiac Catalina
'76 Chevy 1 ton Duallie
'84 Bronco II
'78 Dodge W-200
'81 Toyota 4X4 truck
#201700 03/01/2006 4:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 146
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 146
a guy i know summed it up in a few words. in reference to his new big truck, (2005) he said its not a truck. its a car with a bed behind the seat. eek


Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0