Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (KEVINSKI),
124
guests, and
4
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,130 Posts1,056,706 Members48,454 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 150 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 150 | I just read where the Fed mandated big back cab windows from '68 on. Anyone know why? So the driver could see out, or the cops to see in? | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 132 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 132 | my cpa has a 71 small window, whatcha tryin' to say?
i miss obscene phone calls...
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 132 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 132 | oh, and before any of you "experts" try saying that it's been recabbed, you are wrong, it hasn't.
i miss obscene phone calls...
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 2,893 Socket Breaker | | Socket Breaker Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 2,893 | tomslik - feeling feisty today? Crowbar - who knows what stupid thoughts were going through the fedheads in '68? It is possible but I have no idea... myself. -W | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,636 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,636 | I also had a 71 Chevy with the small back window. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | crowbar - what you just read was in error - the GM trucks started using the 'panorama' back window as standard in 68, but the small window could be had until 72, end of that cab - seat belts and side markers were the only thing mandated by the feds - you might also be interested to know that 68 was the first year there were more V8 trucks produced than 6's
Bill | | | | | Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 543 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 543 | It was a manufacturer thing, not a Fed thing. My '69 Dodge D-100 parts truck has a little back window, and I had a '71 short step Chevy with just a 250, 3-spd and a heater that also was a small window.
Pessimist - Sees glass as half-empty. Optimist - Sees glass as half-full. Gov't- Sees glass and takes it from you because you have a glass. Political Correctness: A philosophical belief system bereft of common sense and logic, that supports and rewards ignorance and stupidity.
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 252 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 252 | I apologize for my error. It's a bit of info passed on to me at some time in the past. I was told it was to easier facilitate the extraction of an injured person from the cab, where access wasn't possible otherwise. Probably the reason for my thought that it was something mandated by a "higher" authority. Although I must say, I have never seen a "light" truck later than '67 with a small back window,(not even a Dodge)I'll take your word that they do exist. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | Originally posted by red58: you might also be interested to know that 68 was the first year there were more V8 trucks produced than 6's
A sad time in the history of trucks! 
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | A sad time in the history of trucks! What?!?!?!? Scott | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | my thought too, Scott, but I think what he's really refering to is the demise of the 283/327 and birth of the 350 Bill | | | | | Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 150 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 150 | I only ask due to this previous post: "In '68 the Federal gov't mandated all light duty trucks to have large back window, and side marker lights on the fenders.
Well, whatever the reason we now have large windows, I LOVE my small window '65, it keeps most of the Texas and Arizona sun off my neck. As an engineer, I would rather have a small window, more steel, less glass. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 2,198 Insomniac | | Insomniac Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 2,198 | You don't need a back window at all as long as you have mirrors on both sides.
Gord 🇨🇦 ---- 1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 132 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 132 | woog,just trying to set the record straight.
btw, it WAS fed mandated about the side marker lights in 68
dual m/c's in 67 altho studebakers had 'em WAY before that.
ya know. i'd LOVE to find a REPUTABLE site for "federal mandates"
seriously.
i think it would be really interesting.
i miss obscene phone calls...
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 543 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 543 | http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/import/FMVSS/#SN101 This is a list of the FMVSS, direct from DOT. It doesn't go into a bunch of detail, rather it lists what that standard applies to. Once you find the specific FMVSS you're looking for, you can Google that specific one, i.e. "FMVSS 101" and see it in much more detail. Pretty easy, no?! 
Pessimist - Sees glass as half-empty. Optimist - Sees glass as half-full. Gov't- Sees glass and takes it from you because you have a glass. Political Correctness: A philosophical belief system bereft of common sense and logic, that supports and rewards ignorance and stupidity.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | good one for the summaries Patrick, but don't even hafta google they\'ve also got the whole list in text or pdf formats -can't get more "reputable" than that isn't the net the greatest resource in history!? Bill | | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | I could totally understand a federal mandate requiring a bigger back window.. since (unless you have a 5 window cab) it might be hard to see stuff over your shoulder..
... but there are alot of vehicles out there with NO back window. Vehicles with boxes on the back come to mind, as well as alot of cargo vans i've seen with no glass in the back doors.
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | |
| |