Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
2 members (tclederman, Phak1),
37
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,090 Posts1,056,031 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 6 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 6 | Hello Everyone, I am trying to decide on a vehicle to restore and was interested in some input from the seasoned pros on this site. I am looking to start a rebuild on a a vehicle this spring, whenever the snow leaves, and am unsure what to take on. I have had my eye on three vehicle not more than a few miles from my home and wonder what might be the simplest to rebuild. I intend to use the truck for work on my family's property and around town for doing various odd jobs. I should say that I have never atacked a project of this age or size before, however I have a great deal of experience working on my car, 1996 GMC Jimmy, and light engines and power equiptment used by the landscaping company I work for in the summer. Anyways the vehicles are a 1947 Chevy 2 ton flatbed. This has been in a barn near me for some time and the engine apperas to be in decent shape, i can't tell if it is a 216, but I asume it is a 235 as the truck was used well into the 1970's. It will turn over by hand and the mice have not chewed through too much of the wiring. That said, there is no clutch, bellhousing or transmission and there is significant rust damage on the passenger side of the truck. The other two vehicles are both of a similar vintage. One is a 56 Chevy 1.5 ton flatbead with 261 motor and 4 speed transmission. It seems to the be the in good shape with moderate rust dameage to the cab and front fenders. That said, knowing the owner, it warants a ver close inspection as it was most likely jerry-rigged to keep it on the road for as long as posible. The last is a GMC 2 ton from 1956. I have yet to give this a thurough inspection, but the rust damage on this seems to be the least of the three. I have not checked on the engine, but I assume it is a 270. The transmission is a 4 speed with a 2 speed rear end. There is also a box on the back of the truck that I would scap in favor of a flatbed should I aquire this truck. Anyways, here they are, any advice you might give me on which one to take on would be helpful. Thanks again, Jay | | | | | Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 687 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 687 | Welcome Jay! I vote for the GMC 2spd, the 1956 Chevy next. Guys here are GOOD we will help all we can. Ben
popcorn The Truth is Out There (Good luck they all sound good and a worthy project.) | | | | | Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,066 Bolter | | Bolter Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,066 | welcome, a lot of the guys have been stuff so maybe they will chime in later,,,Fred Redryder pixMy HotrodA veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of "up to and including my life."I am fighting cancer and I am winning the fight | Pain is part of life; misery is an option. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | My advice is too take on the one that requires the least amount of parts, time and money as a first time project. That way you'll be gaining valuable experience and knowledge and if you get hooked (bet you will  )then you will have a far better handle on what you want as your next prime time ride and what to watch out for. Good Luck! | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 363 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 363 | My advice would be to pick the one you can safely drive for the least amount of work and money. It really is nice to be able to drive it while working on it. Having your first project be months (or years) away from actually driving causes a lot of people to lose interest. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 355 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 355 | So is the engine of the 47 sitting on the ground? With no bellhousing you would have no rear motor mounts. If you only had one choice, then take the 261 engine, its the easiest to get parts for. Sounds like if you could take them all, you could make something out of the group. | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | The GMC would be my first choice if the engine is good. The '56 Chevy a close second. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | GMC's tend to be a little harder to find parts for, especially the body parts, Scott | | | | | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 199 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 199 | That 56 chevy sounds like a decent truck but I agree that you might want to start with a truck that would take the least time and money to get on the road. Hobert
"The Lord is my shepherd"
| | |
| |