Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,036 Posts1,055,450 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#12897 03/11/2005 7:37 PM | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 19 | Hi Everyone, I'm a new guy to this forum as well as Chevy trucks in general. I've only owned mopar pruducts up to this points. My first car was a "civilinized" police car that was 1980 Dodge St Regis. She had a 360 with a thermoquad carb on her. My second car was 1965 Plymouth Barracuda with the 273 v8 2b. carb. I'm now the proud owner of my current project a 1960 k10. Now over the years I've become somewhat acquainted with the pro's and con's of many of the mopar engines in regards to performance, efficiency, reliability, etc. However, I'm starting out totally new in regards to Chevy's. My Dad had the truck before me and pulled the 235 out of it and put in a 400 v8. She has the standard corporate 4-11 diffs. She has HUGE 35x12.5 tires. Her top speed is about 60 miles per hour, but that doesn't matter to me as her purpose will be what she was originally manufactured to be. Now to my loaded question. I say it's loaded because as I read the forums I see a lot of guys who love the stock 6's that came with the trucks and then there are those that love the v8's, but here we go. What is the best Chevy engine to put in this truck for the purposes of hauling, torque, pulling, and general all around oomph? What is the history in regards to reliability of various Chevy engines? I hear alot about the 350. What are your thoughts? [img] http://www.ThePixPlace.com/is17880.jpg[/img] | | |
#12898 03/11/2005 8:34 PM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,751 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,751 | If you can keep it cool, (and that's a big IF) your 400 smallblock will out-torque a 350. The 400 has a 3 3/4" stroke, as opposed to the 350's 3.48" stroke. It also has a 4 1/8" bore, bigger than the 350's 4" bore. Be sure to use the biggest radiator that will fit, and keep it clean. A 7-blade flex fan and a good shroud should be included, and if you're running an automatic transmission, use a big cooler on it, also. The 400's worst enemy is heat that cracks cylinder heads and causes pistons to tighten up and score. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
#12899 03/11/2005 9:18 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | That new 572 big block crate motor is probably going to provide the most power and all-around torque.
The 388 stroker small block might be the easier and more versitile swap.
You probably want to think through what you're willing to spend on the motor, and how much you'll have available to replace broken drive train parts.
If your requirements statement had been cheap and reliable I'd have suggested the 350.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#12900 03/11/2005 9:39 PM | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 1,554 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 1,554 | I have had good luck with the 350s,both my 55 and 72 pickups have late 70s 350 truck motors,4 bolt mains.Just my 2 cents worth. | | |
#12901 03/11/2005 10:39 PM | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | Her top speed is about 60 miles per hour, but that doesn't matter to me as her purpose will be what she was originally manufactured to be. Seems to me that you answered your own question. If it was originally a 235 then put one back in it. | | |
#12902 03/11/2005 11:30 PM | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 19 | Jerry, I'll take to heart what you are saying about the engine running hot. It has always run hot, but I attributed that to the fact that my Dad told me the heat sender unit on the head is off of a 350. I just bought the correct one (right amperage for the guage and such) and will install it when I drain the radiator to install my new heat shutoff valve to my heater core. I'll see how hot it runs then. I do know that my Dad had the original 2 core radiator rebuilt into a 4 core. There is currently a five blade fan on it with a deep pitch to the blades. I'll look into the 7 blade. Thanks | | |
#12903 03/12/2005 12:15 AM | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | I'm running a 454 in my 63 4X4. There isn't anything that truck can't pull, except away from a gas station, Scott | | |
#12904 03/14/2005 6:23 PM | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 19 | Whoops, the picture of my truck disappeared, Here she is again. From my gallery page Shane -- Sorry that I missed the pix on your gallery page. Got it up there now, so it won't disappear from the other web address. So I fixed it here on this link since this image is a better size. Peg | | |
| |