| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Dusty53),
174
guests, and
4
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,101 Posts1,056,180 Members48,436 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | 
#37671 09/11/2004 2:37 AM | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | There's no replacement for displacement. Go with the 350. Parts are cheap and plentiful. I have one in my '64 and love it. If I were to change my engine combo, I'ld still go SBC but go newer with fuel injection.
There's my opinion,
Scott | | | |
Entire Thread
| 
250,292, or 350?
| 64fleetside | 09/10/2004 1:26 PM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| OldSub | 09/10/2004 7:48 PM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| Fred T | 09/10/2004 7:48 PM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| 64fleetside | 09/10/2004 8:12 PM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| LGriffin | 09/10/2004 9:16 PM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| Wrenchbender Ret. | 09/10/2004 9:28 PM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| OldSub | 09/11/2004 1:20 AM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| LGriffin | 09/11/2004 1:41 AM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| 48bigtrucks | 09/11/2004 2:37 AM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| 64fleetside | 09/11/2004 3:34 AM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| OldSub | 09/11/2004 6:32 AM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| HoosierDaddy | 09/12/2004 4:36 AM | |
Re: 250,292, or 350?
| Jed | 09/12/2004 6:16 AM | |
|
|
| |
