The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Hawkman, Tom McGrath, 5 Window 9434, FAST55, dt235sd), 71 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,043
Posts1,055,615
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#874354 08/13/2012 8:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 60
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 60
I am new at this so can someone please help me? I have a 49 chevy truck with a 54 engine and the original transmission and rear end. I want to leave the truck somewhat stock, so I am looking at a 64 chevy c10 rear end. Does anyone know if it will bolt up and clear. Is there anything else I should look for???,,,This rear end is for sale for $100. That is why I am looking at it.

Thanks!!!!

Bill M

Last edited by billm; 08/13/2012 8:45 AM.
billm #874397 08/13/2012 11:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 378
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 378
I think that you can just use the pumkin or third member and keep the the housing and axles on your 49,if you want to. I know the 62 third member will bolt in and I think the 64 will also. Someone else will probably chime in and tell you for sure. I just changed the third member out on my 1949 and it wasn't hard to do at all. Good luck on your 49. Either way you'll have to get a new drive shaft and be sure and set the pinion angle. Also you'll have to get another trans. or get a another rear open drive part for your transmission. From 1955 through 1962 I know will interchange and I think the 1964 will too. Lot less work plus you get a better ratio. Your's is probably a 4:11 ratio. Steven


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton ~ Red Truck

In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Photobucket
Red 49 Truck #874405 08/13/2012 11:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 874
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 874
The '64 rear will be the right width for your '49. You'll have to do some cutting, grinding and welding to install spring perches for it to bolt up to your truck. '62 was the last year for the 1/2 ton with the Eaton drop out third member.


Steve

'49 3800
'52 3600
'57 3100

Ghostrider #874467 08/13/2012 3:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
1964 is not a dropout style.
1955-62 1/2 tons are the only dropout center sections that will fit in the 1940-54 torque tube axle housing to replace the torque tube.
One thing to think about is your 49 has Huck brakes, the 64 has Bendix. Putting better brakes on the back without upgrading the front can be a dangerous proposition. You should at least swap the front over to Bendix at the same time or install an adjustable proportion valve on the rear. You do not want the rear to pass up the front, on a panic stop, which will happen when the rear locks up first.


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Pre '68 Dave #874935 08/15/2012 10:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 378
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 378
Good point. I didn't think of that. I don't have that problem. I just changed out the chunck.


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton ~ Red Truck

In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Photobucket
Red 49 Truck #876928 08/23/2012 10:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 725
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 725
Consider also the width over the mounting surfaces. I believe the '64 rear end has gained about 1 1/2" over your '49, but someone here will know for sure.

Les

Roadmarks #877268 08/24/2012 2:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 874
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 874
Originally Posted by Roadmarks
Consider also the width over the mounting surfaces. I believe the '64 rear end has gained about 1 1/2" over your '49, but someone here will know for sure.

Les


I've got several '63 to '69 1/2 ton truck 12 bolts and they are very close (within fractions of an inch) to the width of an Advance Design truck, which is about 62".


Steve

'49 3800
'52 3600
'57 3100

Ghostrider #877770 08/26/2012 9:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 378
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 378
I told you someone would take up my slack. I wasn't sure about the 64 but was right on the 55-62. If you get a good pumpkin the job is super easy. Onr thing I forgot to tell you. When you take the enclosed shaft out you want to be careful because the housing will rotate to the "ground" because it has nothing to keep it from doing so. Mine did and all I did to correct it was install the "new" pumkin in the housing and jack up under the new rear third member under where the drive shaft will bolt up.Set it (rear end) to the proper angle and weld the rear support at the springs. I hope this helps. Steven


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton ~ Red Truck

In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Photobucket

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0