| |
Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Steelonsteel),
35
guests, and
7
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,010 Posts1,055,299 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 33 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 33 | I'm changing the rear coil springs on my '64 C10 and figured I may as well change the shocks, too... They look as old as the truck. The majority of the time I won't be hauling anything of substantial weight... But, occasionally, I'll haul my 750cc motorcycle.
Any experience, suggestions, etc. on whether to go with air shocks or standard shocks?
'64 C10 Long/Fleet, 230ci w/4 on the floor
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 337 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 337 | I’ve never been a big fan of air shocks, essentially because of how they were most often used back when they were a must have accessory. These were extremely popular in the late 60’s-early 70’s for jacking up the rear end of many cars and trucks. The problem being the upper shock mount on most vehicles was designed only for the shock to control bouncing, not lift the weight of the car. This frequently resulted in tearing holes in the floor or bending the shock mounts. I suppose using them only occasionally would be better than trying to lift the car with them, but even infrequent heavy loads would still induce the same type of stresses. I believe a preferred solution would be something like air lift helper springs which lift at the frame, and not at the shock mounting points. http://www.airliftcompany.com/ | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 33 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 33 | Good call... I never thought about that. I know JUST what you're talking about. I had a '78 Camaro, back in high school, that had air shocks... Sure enough, I'd pump them up JUST to get that extra lift on the back end. Definitely something to consider.
Thanks!
'64 C10 Long/Fleet, 230ci w/4 on the floor
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,262 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,262 | Epanding on Mark's post above.... Months ago I checked into the air lift springs for my 1965, but haven't ordered them yet. My '65 has the 5 inch lowering springs from CPP. Here is what I found out from Dan Urdahl of Airlift Company: From: [email protected]Subject: RE: Airlift Air bag Kit I was able to find the perfect bag for you, In any coil sprung suspension we will want to be within ¼ of an inch on each measurement. I have a kit with bag dimensions of 5.5 (diameter) and 6.5 (height). It is kit number 60812 and I have no doubt that it will be compatible with the dimensions of those springs. The kit will also include the airline, fittings and inflation valves; everything you need to make the kit work. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Thank You, Daniel J. Urdahl AirLift Company
Last edited by Hot Rod John; 10/28/2011 12:32 AM.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 426 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 426 | Alot of after market companies offer stronger shock mounts that bolt in the stock location. Ive seen them in CPP's catalog
| | |
| |
| |