| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,125 Posts1,056,339 Members48,440 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#74714 03/13/2007 1:41 AM | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 11 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 11 | I am considering shoe horning an S10 2.8 or 4.3 with a manual tranny into my 50 3/4 ton Chevy. How well does it fit? What problems will I have? How does the driveshaft / rearend adaption work out? New gauges suggestions? Any other modern engines (straight sixes) that work better? | | |
#74715 03/13/2007 2:13 AM | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 920 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2004 Posts: 920 | Just curious, why? It is much more simple to use what is supposed to go there. I would understand the v-8 thing for easy substantial power. But these old inlines are just as good and better than the engines you speak of IMO. I have a 4.3 in my Safari. I have a 235 in my 62 C-10. The 235 gets way better mileage, and the truck would beat the van in a drag race. It won't even be close when I finish my zoomed up 261. The gearing and radials are the key to how it runs and handles, especially on the freeway. Just my .02. BTW, any relation to Frank an Lena Day from Sheridan? My family (Madia)on my Dad's side is from there. My Grandmas maiden name was Jean Day. | | |
#74716 03/13/2007 2:39 AM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 | I'd think the big issue is using ANY smog motor expecially that puny V6. I'd stick with any inline or jump to the V8. Just my 2 cents. | | |
#74717 03/13/2007 7:56 PM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,809 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,809 | The 2.8 was pretty puny even in the S-10's, especially the carbureted models. Fuel injection helped the reliability a little, and improved the power somewhat, but a good 250, or even a 230 would probably outperform it.
The 4.3 will have the same width problems around the steering gear as a V-8, as it's just a 350 with a couple of cylinders lopped off. Good engine, pretty good power, but it's a gas guzzler. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
| |
| |