The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Bill Hanlon, Cletus1950, Rustnut, Bucker, 52Carl, frogfarmer), 81 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,178
Posts1,057,063
Members48,460
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 581
6
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
6 Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 581
Just want to see what opinions are. A Friend bought this truck with 15 split rims running tubes and radials on the front. The rears are 1 piece 16" radials without tubes. I think the tires are the same, Liberators? I'm thinking the front setup should be ditched for something to match the rears. The tires look to be 10 years or more. Would you feel comfortable driving this way?


1941 G506
More

1946 3800
Pic
More

1946 3600
Pic
More

1924 Ford Model T Fordor
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
10 year old tires don't bother me so much as tubes in modern radials. Especially if they are tubless construction radials. Seen too many fail in the last 20 years in the tire business. I would look into getting a set of matches 16" rims all around. 16x7 with a 3.5" backspace will fit fine. Being a 3/4 ton, I would suggest a 215/85/16 or 235/85/16 E range, 245/75/15 would also be fine, as long as you go with the same load range.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 581
6
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
6 Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 581
That's what I was leaning towards.


1941 G506
More

1946 3800
Pic
More

1946 3600
Pic
More

1924 Ford Model T Fordor
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
I'm in the exact same situation. Will replacement tierod ends allow 4" backspacing. They look like they'll give a extra 1/2" or so which would make wheels easier to come by. If they'll work I'll order a set and a 4 new wheels that I've been looking at.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,596
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,596
I had to modify the steering arms to get mine to fit. I built a new adjustable tie-rod and pittman arm and still had to heat/bend them in about 3/8" on each side. It is a slick set-up now though no play and I can dead center the wheel and it eliminated all the slop. I tried the new ends and it was not enough eventually I dropped them and built my own tie-rod. Wheels are off a 3/4-ton 1991 Suburban.

http://community.webshots.com/photo/2795914510102454676lGUBwI
http://community.webshots.com/photo/2672264650102454676llvBqS

Last edited by Brad Allen; 01/06/2010 3:36 PM.

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0