The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Labor Day

Labor Day

Putting down your wrenches or time for
MORE wrenching?

Wrenching this Labor Day
Plenty of places to share.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (baldeagle, J Lucas, Rusted Nut, sron48, TIM ZINDLER), 25 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,005
Posts1,055,253
Members48,418
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#455123 09/23/2008 4:04 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
3
New Guy
New Guy
3 Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
When removing the engine from my '33 truck, I found the front engine mount and retainer bolted underneath the frame crossmember. Essentially, the engine sat directly upon the crossmember with the bolts through rubber engine mount and retainer below the crossmember. This configuration does not seem correct. Shouldn't the engine mount be sandwiched between the engine mount and the crossmember? I have not been able to locate any illustrations in parts books or repair manuals. Any help is appreciated.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
1933-54 truck used the same mount. Here is a link to a picture. The top right mount is yours, it consists of four pieces.

http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/1929_54chevyparts/00/095.HTM


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 165
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 165
The mount is under the crossmember.

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 47
D
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 47
Hi. I just unbolted an original front engine mount from a '49 Chevy 3/4-Ton with a 216. The four-piece set-up was mounted on the top side of the crossmember underneath the engine faceplate.

This seems like a strange engine mount since there is no real rubber isolation between the engine and the frame. Is there a better front engine mount available? I will be installing my new rebuilt 261 in my '49 Chevy very soon.

Thanks,
Dan M.

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,317
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,317
If you check out the shop manual illustration of the front mount, you'll see that it is deceivingly simple but they don't mention that if not installed to the letter, will cause untold grief.

http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2783812490090459121pDxClp

(You'll need to click on "Full Size" in the upper right corner to enlarge this picture so you can see the front engine mount)

Note that the rubber insert can be installed upside down which does make a difference and the clearance between the top plate and the box that holds the insert is critical. My reproduction rubber insert was not as thick as the original and without a load, the top 1/8" plate showed adequate clearance from the bottom box. It was only after I installed the mount, installed the engine with the 620 pounds of weight, and cranked the engine, did I note the lack of clearance and the resulting vibration through the frame.

Trust me when I say that it is best to clamp the mount in a vise securely and make sure that you have adequate clearance. Correcting this lack of clearance requires working on your back under the crossmember with the radiator removed, a jack under the engine and was a big PITA.

So, take my word for it....get the insert correctly installed, clamp it in a vise and squeeze it and I'll bet you'll wind up trimming 1/8" off the upper rim of the lower box component. You'll get enough road feedback through a stock steering column without additional vibrations from the engine.

Dave




Last edited by Fla54Chevy3100; 09/25/2008 1:23 PM.

Webshot "Tips and tricks" and "Shoebox" Photo Albums

EXPERIENCE is the best teacher...but it gives the test first...and the lesson afterwards.

"What this generation tolerates...the next will embrace"
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,377
T
Ex Hall Monitor
Ex Hall Monitor
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,377
I get a "forbidden" message when I try to view your link Dave.


Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet.
The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion.
Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,317
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,317
Sorry about that....try this link.....

Dave


Webshot "Tips and tricks" and "Shoebox" Photo Albums

EXPERIENCE is the best teacher...but it gives the test first...and the lesson afterwards.

"What this generation tolerates...the next will embrace"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,596
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,596
Another trick with any of the rubber that press fits (like the suspension bumpers on the front springs) if you throw them in the freezer overnight and work quickly they will usually slide right in.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
3
New Guy
New Guy
3 Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
Thank you all for your help. Unfortunately, I am still confused. Upon removing the engine from my '33 truck I found the rubber mount (3657520) and the lower retainer (368449) bolted underneath the frame crossmember. The plate (3657522) and the cover (3656502) were not present. According to Master Parts and Accessories Catalog only the rubber mount and lower retainer are applicable to my '33 year. What has me concerned is that the engine front cover plate has worn the frame crossmember at the mounting point. With the mount bolted from underneath, there does not seem to be enough clearance between the engine front cover plate and the frame. If the engine mount was mounted on top of the frame crossmember, sandwiched between the engine and crossmember, clearance would not be an issue. Any help with my '33 problem is appreciated.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
I would re ask this question on the VCCA site. I seem to remember that the early trucks did have the mount under the crossmember.
http://vccachat.org/forum/ubbthreads.php


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
3
New Guy
New Guy
3 Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
Thank you, I did visit the other site and confirmed the mount was installed correctly. Thanks again

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
C
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
I have a 1935 Chevy PU and the front engine mount is only two pieces, the rubber and a heavy metal case. the assembly mounts under the cross member and the rubber sticks up through the holes in the cross member.there is no metal plate on top. Seems like there is enough clearance. This assembly does not mount on top of the cross member. The angle of the engine would be such that the drive shaft would be hitting the ground before it reached the rear end.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0