| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,107 Posts1,056,225 Members48,436 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 83 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 83 | I'm thinking this is the best place to post this question, but if not I'll move it over to the Big Bolt forum.
I have a '46 Chevy 2 Ton COE with a stuck engine and a 4 on the floor. I have worked on the engine for quite some time using Kroil, and Engine Release and it is still stuck. Recently I got it clean enough to determine this engnie is a 1950 235 (obviously not original).
So here's the interesting part, I have another engine that is a 1954 Chevy 235 out of a 3/4 T pickup with the 4 on the floor and turns freely. (I believe this is a full pressure engine.) I am looking to pull the stuck engine out of the COE and put in the '54 that turns over. Since both are 4 on the floor will the bell houseing (clutch housing) be the same for both engines and bolt up to the COE transmission?
In other words when I go to pull the engine can I swap the engine AND bell housing from the '54 and put it in the '46 COE and have it bolt right in so I don't have to mess with the clutch and flywheel?
Thanks, Chevman | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | The '54 235 would be a full pressure motor and the pickup version is the same length as the earlier motor. I'd call that '54 motor a good choice.
Since you have a '50 motor in the truck now, are you sure you have the original bellhousing and transmission in the truck now?
The later transmission is different both where it meets the bellhousing and inside. If you have the original transmission in the truck, and want to keep it, you need to stay with the original bellhousing. The early transmission does not have synchos and has a little lever on the shifter to allow shifting into reverse.
RustedNuts put an SM420 in his early GMC COE, he may come along and be able to tell you more about what that takes.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 | How'd I miss this one?
As mentioned the 235 would be a direct swap. Youll need to relocate the oil filter as it wont fit with the updraft manifold setup. If you want to use the old non synchro tranny you need nothing more then swap out the engine only and keep the bellhousing from the COE.
There is a difference in the bellhousing as the old one should have a 3 bolted pivot bar on the drivers side for the clutch fork. The sm420 wont fit the pattern on the old bellhousing.
You have a bit more work if you want to swap to the sm420. Its fairly easy, but time consuming. Check out most of my pictures on my photobucket account. I have a section in there where I kept the photos of my swap. There is roughly an 1 to 2" difference in length of the driveshafts also, meaning the sm420 is a longer transmission.
I believe Chevy used a crossmember instead of the mounts seen in my pictures of my GMC, so that may complicate matters to.
Hope that helps, Jeff | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 83 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 83 | Thanks for the advice guys! Chevman | | |
| |
| |