The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Labor Day

Labor Day

Putting down your wrenches or time for
MORE wrenching?

Wrenching this Labor Day
Plenty of places to share.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (TexasJim50, Peggy M, Woodcmiami, farmallb, WICruiser, 66flea), 45 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,010
Posts1,055,299
Members48,419
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#37153 12/03/2002 6:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
I'm in the process of swapping out my 216 for a 235 and I noticed that the rear engine mounts (which are the same for both engines) don't appear to bolt the engine down - They are two metal sleeves that "nest" together, with a rubber pad on one of them. The way they are currently installed, the engine can travel upwards, and I'm thinking that on a sever enough bump, the engine could jump out of the lower mount!

Is this the correct way for these to be installed?


46 GMC
#37154 12/03/2002 10:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
There is a bolt running through them to hold them to the crossmember. Trust me, they hold it down- I had a heck of a time getting mine out. The rubber had decayed and the bolt sunk down in.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
#37155 12/04/2002 4:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 31
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 31
Gabi,

Hope I'm not out of line. Your name denotes a GMC. Are you sure you have a 216? Most are 228's and a different size physically than a Chevrolet I6. Just a thought... Good luck !


Thomas Mott
1949 GMC 250
1957 Dodge COE c-700
1959 Chris Craft 17' w/big journal 327 for more power
#37156 12/04/2002 7:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks for the info - The old engine was probably not the original and the numbers never confirmed it as a 216, but it had all the other tell-tale signs (as best as I could tell). Anyways, the replacement is definately a 235 -

The bell housing off of the 216(?) fits right on to the 235 - therefore using the same engine mounts.

In regards to the bolting down of the mounts, I cannot figure out how to bolt through the two peices. One bolts to the frame and the other to the engine with no way to join them other than one fitting around the other like a 3/4 sleeve.

Actually, What I really need is a picture!


46 GMC
#37157 12/04/2002 11:12 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
T. Mott,
you are looking at the wonders of a Canadian GMC. They used Chev engines and chassis. The 216 they used looks like a 235 on the outside, small sidecover, larger manifold, but it had the stroke and bore of a 216. I have mine apart right now and I have been coming across all these interesting details!


1951 GMC 1 Ton Flatbed -- It is finally on the road and what a great time I have driving it!
1951 1 Ton Completed


My Chevy Master 4 Door is on the Road!
#37158 12/04/2002 9:16 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 587
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 587
Gabe, I think you have the b/house mounts setting together on top of frame and not correctly installed. The top of frame has the big part that bolts to side of housing setting right on the x-over inline with holes. The second peice goes underneath and fits into the x-over and bolt goes thru it, has big washer then nut. This way you have rubber on top and bottom. Maybe, I'm thinking of my old Firds, hmmmmm! Some later year 235's needed a slanted x-over and had slanted ears on the b/house to match. The earlier ones had flatter x-over and b/house was straitht up and down. Clear as Mudd? You need to get a shop manual if you don't have one. Should be pix in it of the mounts. Get a Chevy manual if Chev engines in Canadian trucks.
What ever you find, I'm thinking you dont have the mounts on right, or they are bolted up now and need to be seprated and bolted thru the x-over. They ARE bolted down, don't just set there.


G.L. Grumpy's
Old Iron Ranch
Huntington, IN 46750


MM R tractor, Speedex
and Power King tractors
#37159 12/05/2002 7:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
It's getting clearer every day - Thanks for the help. The shop manual I have doesn't show anything of the engine mounts, but I've been playing around with the mounts and I'll be able to figure it out.

Thanks for the help

Martin


46 GMC

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0