Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,076 Posts1,055,924 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 102 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 102 | Should I replace the worn out 350 in the 63 GMC sub 4x4 that I got last July with another 350 or as a friend suggests with a 283 with the right stuff to be more fuel efficient?
Will the truck be underpowered?
I plan to build the engine on the bench this winter and have it swaped in in the spring.
The truck now has new power breaks (drums) and power steering.
EB
Last edited by Peggy M; 06/06/2023 9:36 PM. Reason: added more info to the title
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 244 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 244 | Go with a crate 350 engine from the dealer. It'll have warantee nation wide and accessories are readily available. As for fuel effieciency, the gearing and size of carb combinaition will give you that. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 153 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 153 | I went with the 350 crate in my 61 panel. Added an Edlebrock carb and intake and switched the rear to a 3:08 as its my daily driver. I cant complain at all. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 584 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 584 | I don't know guys, there is something sweet about a 283 or even a 327 in the older trucks.
A 350 won't get you any better milage. Any fuel effeciency differences are offset by a smaller engine having to work just a little harder to pull the load. "There is no substitute for cubic inches" is the old addage, meaning if you want easy horsepower then 350 would have a slight advantage... | | | | | Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,552 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,552 | I am a purist. Go stock vintage equipment!
Happy Holidays.
Tony | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,971 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,971 | What's going to make you happy in the end?
The 283s worked for years. No, they won't have the HP, but who don't have a crate motor? Crate motors are a dime a dozen. I never wanted the same thing as the other guy.
Do what makes sense to you. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 335 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 335 | bore the 305 out to 450 cubes!!!!!!!! | | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 34 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 34 | Im am going to swap a 350 ls1 out of a late model caprice that way I can have the best of both worlds ,computerized control fuel injection for fuel economy and enough torque and hp. to pull any thing that I will want to pull. the biggest facor is that this setup will be designed for my pourpose and may not suit yours, you have to determine what will best suit your application and go with that!
it's not how much time you spend on it, it's how you spend your time with it
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 74 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2005 Posts: 74 | You oughtta drop a 389\400\455 Pontiac in there and run a well-tuned Quadrajet. Plenty of power and gas mileage. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 102 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 102 | Thanks for the replies guys.....will have to think about if I think I will ever want to tow anything in the future. If I don't tow I still think a 283 should be enough engine for the old burb.
Will record the process which ever way I go and post some pics when its done.
Thanks again!
eb's 63 | | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 180 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 180 | After reading the first post, I already see flaws in your process. There is nothing anyone can tell you on here, or anything that a friend is going to tell you that makes your decision for you. You've gotta know for yourself what you want to do with your old truck. If your friend wants an old suburban with a 283 in it, let him build one, or if someone on here wants an old suburban with a 327 or 350, or whatever the case may be, let them build it! You're the one with the bloody knuckles, late nights in the garage, and time away from the family with this truck. If you originally wanted to go with a 350, I think gearing, carburetion, and transmission choice would get you equally as good of fuel economy as a 283. A V8 is a V8, 283 or 350, either one will get you about the same fuel economy, and neither will be great. Especially in a big old truck like you have. Its your choice of carb, rear gear and transmission that will make up the rest. I'm saying stick to your guns!
1950 Chevy 3100 5 window "in progress" 1967 Chevelle 300
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 180 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 180 | Robin 58.....c'mon man, thats not even funny.
1950 Chevy 3100 5 window "in progress" 1967 Chevelle 300
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 87 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 87 | A 235 will pull the truck around O.K. It may not have enough poop to tow a car on a car trailer, but for every day driving the 6 works good.
Toxictiki
'59 Apache 3100 panel (235) '51 Chevy Fleetline Deluxe (216) '48 Binder KB-1 (flathead 6) '77 Cadillac DeVille (425 donor)
"Once I was 'Chairman of the Bored' then I bought a Stovebolt."
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 335 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 335 | I have a Ranger helicopter jet engine but you would have to get rid of the second and third seats and upgrade the brakes | | | | | Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 159 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 159 | Keep in mind if you run the original power pack heads they have no bolt holes for the accesory mounts.If you don't currently use them no worries.Just a thought.
In the works 2006 GEN III 6.0 /4L80E/ 205 New process,A/C and power brakes .
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 102 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 102 | Yooz guys are amazing.....I'll let you know which way I go with the engine...good point about the heads on the orig 283 but I"ve got 305 heads already built and everything else for either but the crank and the pistons. I'm leaning toward the 350 though because I might want to tow in the future....little travel trailer maybe.
A merry Christmas and happy new year to all
Thanks guys!
EB's 63 | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 | I don't know how much horsepower you want, but I had a '57 Chev. Bel Air Sport Coupe with a 283 that ran 14 sec. et's at almost 100 m.p.h. back in '57, it would smoke the tires for a block too, so I'd think power would not be a problem. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 28 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 28 | | | |
| |