| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,192 Posts1,057,227 Members48,465 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | 
#23629 05/04/2005 2:24 AM | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 25 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 25 | I have a 56 Chevy pickup with a 79 Camaro drive train. The problem is the axil assembly is to wide (61" drum to drum) to run a wide tire and wheel combo. Anyone know of a GM vehical with a rear axil assembly that is narrower than the camaro with the same 10 bolt pig so I don't have to modify my drive shaft? | | |
#23630 05/04/2005 3:32 AM | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | Try a V-8 powered Monza. Maybe an S10 pick-up? Someone will be along soon that has actually done such a swap. I'm mainly a "big" truck guy.
Welcome aboard,
Scott | | |
#23631 05/04/2005 4:31 AM | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 613 Member | | Member Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 613 | the monza and s10 have 7.5" rearends which will be fine if you are running a six cylinder. | | |
#23632 05/04/2005 5:25 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | My '78 Monte Carlo is 58 inches or close to that. On an AD truck that's narrow enough to make tubbing likely.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#23633 05/04/2005 3:23 PM | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 148 Member | | Member Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 148 | why can't you just get some wheels with a lot of backspacing?
2003 ford lightning
1959 chevy 36
| | |
#23634 05/04/2005 10:37 PM | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | It seems to me a nova of that era had the same rear end but was narrower.
They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
#23636 05/04/2005 10:52 PM | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 148 Member | | Member Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 148 | i'll measure my 77 nova when i get home. i plan to use the 10 bolt rear out of it under my 59
2003 ford lightning
1959 chevy 36
| | |
#23637 05/05/2005 2:53 AM | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 158 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 158 | Nova and 70-78(?) Camaro rears are interchangeable. Same width, same spring perch spacing.
Cheers,
mark. | | |
|
|
| |
