Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (wvstovebolt),
31
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,009 Posts1,055,293 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 187 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 187 | Greetings gang, As I learn more about web design and also how to use Front Page, I try to update my Chevy C60 website to make it easier to navigate and just make it look better. I just got done doing an update...mostly cosmetic and easier to view for those folks with lower screen resolution (still...best viewed at 1024 x 768). Take it for a test drive and let me know how it looks... Thanks gang!!! | | | | | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | The site doesn't seem to want to load. Who are you hosting it through?
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 684 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 684 | It looks good. It came right up for me. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 187 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 187 | Alan,
I had trouble last night shortly after I uploaded to changes.
I use ipowerweb.com as my host...and I called them about the issue. They were doing a facilities related maintenance that required a 4 hour power down.
The site works now...
Thanks | | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 | looks nice. I like the organization of the site. Good job!! | | | | | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | It came up instantly today.
It looks good, Burgie! Easy to navigate, too!
Good job!
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 183 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 183 | Nice jog, Burgie. Don't know if it's just my computer, but to read an entire sentence I have to move to the right, then go back to the left to continue on. It's like the document is bigger than the screen. Some real good info at your site! | | | | | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | Hey, fredoly
I guess you have a very small monitor? This year, the web is upping it's standard to 1000 pixels wide, so you'll be having this problem more and more in the future.
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 187 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 187 | fredoly,
The issue that you are seeing is not a problem with your computer or my web site...it's just an issue of screen resolution versus the size of the tables I elected to use when designing my web site.
When I revised my web site I first checked around a few forums dealing with web design and the topic of screen resolution was abundant. One such site had a poll that asked “What screen resolution do you use?” The survey yielded 648 respondents. The results are shown below:
640x480…0…0% 800x600…9…1.39% 1024x768…230…35.49% 1152x864…45…6.94% 1280x960…18…2.78% 1280x1024…190…29.32% 1600x1200…91…14.04% 2048x1539…5…0.77% Other…60…9.26%
Older monitors and graphics cards used to support resolutions of 640 x 480, 800 x 600, 1024 x 768 and perhaps higher in a few instances when more expensive monitors were purchased. However, now it is common place to achieve resolutions higher than 1600 x 1200 which, incidentally, is what I run on my Dell XPS 21” digital flat panel screen.
When I modified the pages of my web site I set the data in centered tables that are 950 pixels wide. Why? So anyone with a screen resolution setting of 1024x768 or higher (which, according to the poll above is 98.61% or the respondents) will be able to see the whole page in “one screen” without using scroll bars. When I view my web site on my computer it is centered in the screen and I see dead space on each side because I am using a screen resolution is 1600x1200 (i.e. my web page is 950 pixels wide, yet my screen is 1600 pixels, so I actually have 325 pixels on each side of the table I used for the web site). Does that make sense? Say, for example, you are using a screen resolution of 800x600. Your screen will only display 800 pixels worth of data…and since my table is 950 pixels wide, a scroll bar appears at the bottom so you can scroll from side to side to read all the data.
Now, mind you, I am no specialist in web design, and if I wrote anything that is incorrect I hope an expert can chime in and clarify…but this is the way I understand things.
True, 648 people is nothing compared to the millions of people that surf the web. However, like any poll, it represents a statistical slice of the population. Given that less than 2% use a screen setting of less than 1024x768…I elected to design my web with the majority in mind.
Thanks much and I hope this explanation clarifies things a bit??? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | Burge: Looks good and a lot better than some pros I've seen.
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 | Very well organized!
I like it! | | |
| |