The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (‘37ChevyPU, Steelonsteel, dt235sd, carbking), 67 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,051
Posts1,055,766
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1305714 04/02/2019 4:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
Hope you read Carb Kings write up that you have to have at least a 4" distance between carb mount surface and manifold mount surface for a two bbl adapter to get you back to the same readings as the stock factory set up.


Evan
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
Set, as in two of them? Since it's progressive, the barrels must be aligned across from the head, not along the length of the manifold.
And... what manifold?

WE b OLD #1305746 04/02/2019 10:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
WE b OLD #1305753 04/02/2019 11:45 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,214
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,214
Your link is broken...

Mike B smile


Mike Boteler

1956 Chevy 3100 Resto Rod
1952 Willys M38 Army Jeep
1983 Jeep CJ7 Laredo
1984 Jeep CJ7
+++++
Silver Spring, MD
WE b OLD #1305764 04/03/2019 12:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 44
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 44
Hmmmmmmmmmm
404 thats an error. The set up or the link?


There is not a tool made that if you don't try hard enough you can't break!
1952 3100 261 T5 3.08 Gov Locker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
Trying again. Last time.


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
The link works, my earlier comments w/r/t adapter and alignment apply: the adapter is too short + too small.

WE b OLD #1305862 04/04/2019 12:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,482
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,482
Hi Ron. Serious opinions are what you asked for...so here is mine: For the first thing with 2 of these you will have about 3 times the CFM rating the 235 needs. Let's go back and look at the equation: Cubic inch (235) x max RPM you expect to be using (let's say 3000...which with your gearing should be a good number) x efficiency factor (let's say .80...for a stock 235 it may be more like .75, however) = 564,000 divided by 3456 = 163. That means 163 CFM ought to be plenty for you. Each of the carburetors you're considering shows to have 240 CFM for a total of 480. 480 divided by 163 = 2.94. 294% too much. This is like filling a stewpot instead of a cereal bowl with your Post Toasties for breakfast. For the second thing, the post by Jon (CarbKing) a few days ago did an excellent job at describing the interference problem you will have with 2 carburetors on an inline six with siamese ports. For the third thing these carburetors were not designed for this engine at all. What I think you need to do is abandon the split exhaust and dual carb setup you have. Go back to a stock exhaust and intake manifold, make absolutely certain the heat flapper in the stock exhaust manifold works as designed, mount it all correctly and then put a properly rebuilt Carter carburetor on there. Make sure whoever rebuilds it pays attention to the fuel inlet orifice size and doesn't use what is being sold out there today. I posted this last summer when I was looking into these...the proper inlet orifice could be .76, it could be .81, depends on the model you have...the ones in the FLAPS type kits are going to be for Ford applications and are too large by 25% or more. Good luck!


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,771
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,771
Jon, I've been saying the same thing for months- - - - -you're going to be ignored.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
WE b OLD #1305914 04/04/2019 10:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,095
When I read HRL response I sald to my self, self don't respond but here I go again. Jerry, you are a shooter and for the last 10 years, you used your favorite double barrel and it gave you the results you wanted. Then all of a sudden it did not and you mentioned to a friend what happened and he said you need to go to a single barrel. So you said no it served me well for years and I still want to use it the way it was because it was ok for 10 years and there has to be a reason that it has changed. I know I am using more ammo to get the same results but I will keep checking to get it back to the way it was.


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0