Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,003 Posts1,055,244 Members48,418 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 89 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 89 | OK, I have searched the forum and still am confused! I am working on a 1947 3600, and need front wheel bearings. I'd like to move into "modern" style roller bearings (converting to disc brakes). Question 1: Are these the same size as on a 3100 truck? Question 2: I have heard of problems with the dust seals not fitting - where is the best place to buy a "kit"? Question 3: Is it "necessary" to convert? Thanks! | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | 1, No, different bearings than a 1/2 ton 2a, Not sure about dust/grease seals 2b, There were for a short time tapered roller bearing kits for the 3/4 and 1 ton offered by one or a few of the restoration parts vendors. These bearings were non standard size, seemingly made for this one application, the part numbers on the bearings did not cross to anything else available. They were Chinese bearings. Best I can tell no longer available, unless you commission your own production run of special bearings. 3, No, the original type bearings are adequate.
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2016 Posts: 102 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2016 Posts: 102 | I will simply answer question 3. It is not necessary. I have a 48 3600 with original style wheel bearings, disc brakes, a 292 and T5. It stops and steers just fine.
Jon | | | | | Joined: Dec 2014 Posts: 357 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2014 Posts: 357 | What's so great about roller bearings. I don't understand. When I was young I worked in a Hardware Store. We were branded ACE but purchased from others. The Old Timer's there showed me the difference between the Milwaukee power tools and other tool company's. The Milwaukee tools had ball bearings. Why do venders sell kits to swap from ball to roller bearings
Julian Carter
1970 Triumph GT6 1967 Triumph TR4A 1952 Chevy 3600 1948 MG-TC
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,190 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,190 | A ball bearing works better when there is little to no load pushing sideways on the bearings, a tapered roller bear can support the sideways load better. A tapered roller bearing also has way more surface area in contact to support the loads, ball bearings have very little surface area contact. As for power tools, a ball bearing far better then a bushing. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Ball bearings used for wheel bearings are angular contact ball bearings, they are designed to handle significant side load as well as radial load.
True the "ball bearings" in a shape you think of first are primarily radial.
The original ball type wheel bearinsg were obviously designed or evaluated for the application, and have worked great for 3/4 of a century or better. Tapered roller bearings are also good. Lots of modern stuff has gone back to ball type wheel bearings, now they're an assembly of two bearings relatively close together as one unit. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | The main reason I've gone to tapered roller in the past was that ball bearings were 8X more money. Not sure if that is still the case. I've only had 1/2T TF. Tapered roller are better bearings. But the better design is not necessary in this case.
3. "Is it necessary to convert?" It's a moot point if they are not available.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,740 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,740 | Any machinist worthy of the name can adapt tapered roller bearings to hubs intended for ball bearings. Other than a cost and availability advantage in favor of the tapered bearings, I can't see much of a reason to go to the effort and expense to do so. Since very few of our trucks see working conditions approaching what they were designed and built for, "upgrading" to a higher capacity bearing is a fool's mission. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 1,904 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2001 Posts: 1,904 | I'm guessing they switched from ball bearings to roller bearings is it's a whole lot easier (cheaper) to make perfectly round cylinders (rollers) than perfectly round balls. Years ago, a bearing "expert" on this forum even said if you have them, ball bearings were superior to the rollers. 1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet 34 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,270 | The roller bearings on these trucks seem to last somewhere past forever. If I find that they are clean and have grease on them, I run them regardless of how old they may be.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | |
| |