Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,005 Posts1,055,266 Members48,418 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 | OK, so I've got the motor back in and getting it all 'set up'. It's a 70's 292, original 1952 dizzy with no vacuum advance, not sure of age single barrel Rochester B carb. What kind of mixture, idle and timing should I set it to? It seems to idle about 650, runs great at idle, but stumbles and stutters over 3200. Also what would be a redline value? Not that I'd take her there, but to know. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,190 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,190 | Mixture, and timing are going to be from the feel of how it drives and runs down the road. With mismatched parts, factory spec's will not apply. You will have to test drive and change, test drive and change, etc..... till it feels about right.
You really should have vacuum advance hooked up, the engine will run cleaner and fuel milage will increase.
The upper rpm range will be around 4800 or so. I suspect the rough running over 3200 is a lean condition along with timing problems. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,742 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,742 | It's a 70's 292, original 1952 dizzy with no vacuum advance Are you sure that setup will work? The 1952 distributor would be for a 216, and I'm fairly sure the drive gears and the oil pump drive don't match up. I know a 230/250/292 distributor will not work right in a 216 or a 235. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 1,451 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 1,451 |
BC 1960 Chevy C10 driver 261 T5 4.10 dana 44 power loc 1949 GMC 250 project in waiting 1960 C60 pasture art Retired GM dealer tech. 1980 - 2022 | | | | | Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 | Distributor#1112369 according to parts guy: 1952 248/270. Which for my big bolt woulda been the base and optional motors. No idea which it was. I got it in running (poorly) condition with the 70's 292 with that distributor. Sorry but it is working, just not yet timed great. Thus my original questions, anybody?
Thanks JoeH, thats kinda what I expected. Oh and there is no vacuum advance on it at all to hook up. Just the internal mechanical.
Im trying to keep it as 'original' as it was at my purchase and just repairing or replacing in kind.
Last edited by 52vff; 11/12/2016 5:02 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 2,187 Insomniac | | Insomniac Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 2,187 | Try checking the points gap. I remember having an engine that seemed to run well but at about 3,000 rpm it stumbled horribly. Gapped the points properly and all was good.
Gord 🇨🇦 ---- 1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed | | | | | Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 | Ah great suggestion. However, spec for that is 18 thou if I remember, at that it runs horribly, backfires, sputtering. At about 30 thou runs much better. And that's where it is right now. Now will going spec on points be better as timing gets closer too??? I know current timing is way advanced, not sure how much. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,440 Bolter | | Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,440 | Points are off far enough to cause the problem you describe.
Martin '62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress) '47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project) ‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily) ‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence) “I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one! Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop! USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 2,187 Insomniac | | Insomniac Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 2,187 | 0.030 seems way too wide for points gap. I would set the points to specs and check the dwell to make sure it's right. Once that's done, set the timing. Google supplied tune up specs: Tune Up Specs Final timing might have to be done after driving test; if it pings under load, retard the timing. On my 1980 pickup, I found I could run it with a few extra degrees of advance for (hopefully) improved fuel economy. Worked fine during normal use but when there was a heavy camper in the back, there would be pinging and the timing had be set back.
Last edited by Gord&Fran; 11/13/2016 4:52 PM.
Gord 🇨🇦 ---- 1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed | | |
| |