The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (Gdads51, frogfarmer, Bill Hanlon, LAROKE, gswbbc, Forty9, 48jim1ton, Hotrod Lincoln), 107 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,043
Posts1,055,540
Members48,425
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1100931 05/05/2015 7:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
C
New Guy
New Guy
C Offline
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Well, I now own a 57 Task Force Flatbed. I'm not entirely sure what I own, but am puzzling it out. The VIN code on the body is a 3E, which I believe indicates a 3/4 ton. However, it's a dually with a 138" wheelbase. It also has a 4-speed on the floor, not the 3 on the column which I thought was the norm for a 3/4.

I'm going to start taking some more measurements tomorrow, as well as looking for tags elsewhere. Any suggestions on what else to look for to help identify what frame this is on? Were 3/4s produced on such a long wheelbase?

Cosmetically, the truck has a terrible paint job. Poorly done white (unintentionally two tone) over a still quite visible in spots blotchy blue. But the panels seem in reasonable condition. Free of major dents, and the paint job, while not pretty, seemed to have done it's job of keeping the rust away. Surface rust here and there, but only a couple spots that I'll need to patch with metal. (So far as I've been able to tell.) I turned down several other much rustier options before this one came along.

The other good news is that it runs. Well enough for me to have driven it home anyway. It had me worried for a bit as the temperature needle had barely started to move when it flew hard over to H. However, the fan was running, although squealing some and the belt seemed loose, the radiator was warm but not boiling, and the engine was still cool enough to put my hand against it for a brief moment. I checked it several times on the drive home with similar results, kept it at light revs and hoped for the best. Checked it again once I stopped with a thermometer on a bunch of places across the block and radiator. Highest was around 205°F. That seemed in the range of normal to me, though I know next to nothing about these engine. After it cooled, another start took it up to hard over on H within about 10 min. of running. If it's overheating, that seems very fast.

Hoping I've not destroyed anything, I'll be checking the sender unit, thermostat, and tightening the fan belt in the coming days. Any other obvious things to look into at this point?

Here are some pictures after it's first bath. The terribly paint job really comes through as I start to cut through the layers of dirt. Not so bad in the pictures, but the patchiness over the previous teal color is very noticeable in person. Ah well, the family has requested it be dark blue eventually anyway. I was loosing light as I wrapped up cleaning, hence the grainy pictures. First thing to go were the wooden sides to that flatbed. A set of nice edge panels will be in order once mechanical issues are addressed.

Front End
Whole Truck
Interior
Dash

With little idea what I'm doing with restoration/modification work or what I've gotten myself into, here goes nothing...

CountFred #1100996 05/05/2015 8:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,215
Leo Offline
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,215
Welcome Fred, looks like a 1 ton to me, but I'm not up on the task force trucks all that much. 4 on the floor trannies were in all series of trucks, optional in the half tons.

Looks like not a bad truck, just make a plan and get it done. Good luck.

Leo

CountFred #1101111 05/06/2015 5:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,987
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,987
Usually only the half tons had 3 speeds, and anything larger than that had 4 speeds.
Looks like you've got a good solid old truck. Keep us posted on your progress, and welcome to the Bolt!


Rich
1947 Loadmaster
1947 Chev. Loadmaster
1959 Chev. Viking 40

Life is short--eat dessert first!
CountFred #1101135 05/06/2015 12:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Welcome to Stovebolt. Best chevy and GMC site on the web. Nice truck you got there. I've always wanted me one with a stake bed.
Thanks for posting pics.


1937 Chevy Pickup
In the Gallery
1952 Chevy Panel
In the Gallery
More photos
1950 Chevy Coupe
Pictures!

I'd rather walk and carry a Chevy hub cap than ride in a Ferd.
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you smile
CountFred #1101382 05/07/2015 6:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
C
New Guy
New Guy
C Offline
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
So I think I determined some of my confusion with the VIN code versus the wheelbase (according to the wheelbases listed in the 1957 Truck Specifications document. It appears the frame was modified with an extra foot welded in, which increased the wheelbase. It was hidden behind the way this bed is mounted to the frame which is one reason I missed it when I looked the truck over. Still wishing I hadn't missed that, but, live and learn...

While I want to clean this truck up, it will continue to be a farm truck and I want to continue to use it. I'm now on the fence about whether I want to keep this modified frame, or keep my eyes open for a larger truck to come along and "upgrade" the frame. I have a potential lead on a 1.5ton with a very rusty body, but a good condition frame (and this one I was able to inspect all around). Of course doing that would end up with larger axles and perhaps more difficulty in sourcing things like brake upgrades, wheels, etc... Still it would put my mind at ease as far as payload.

Anybody have any experience with evaluating/inspecting frame modifications like this? If it's sound, I figure it should still haul loads just fine, but not sure how I can tell if it is sound.

CountFred #1101502 05/08/2015 5:14 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,987
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,987
Lots of expertise on the 1.5 and 2 tons over on the Big Bolt Forum. Stop in over there and check it out.


Rich
1947 Loadmaster
1947 Chev. Loadmaster
1959 Chev. Viking 40

Life is short--eat dessert first!

Moderated by  Achipmunk, Rusty Rod 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0