The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Peggy M, Bucker, Hotrod Lincoln, klhansen, Hush, Tronman), 76 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,206
Posts1,057,435
Members48,471
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Had a conversation with a truck friend of mine and we were discussing the length of shock needed for the GMC ride he is building. I generally measure and see what is available with about half exposed which means half in or half out....I've used a few other methods on what I "thought" would work better due to weight.

...so what do you guys use as a "rule of thumb" when buying the correct length of shock? Thanks for you input.


1937 Chevy Pickup
In the Gallery
1952 Chevy Panel
In the Gallery
More photos
1950 Chevy Coupe
Pictures!

I'd rather walk and carry a Chevy hub cap than ride in a Ferd.
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you smile
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 160
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 160
I recall searching tech stuff on the net that 60% of the total travel should be available for compression from ride height. Sorry don't recall the site but it seems a logical estimate when you think about the forces a shock sees- much higher on compression than rebound.


NHluvstruck...
1951 3100 5-window,.sold, regretted
https://stonefacegarage.wixsite.com/mysite
51 Chevy Restoration Page
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 27
8
New Guy
New Guy
8 Offline
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 27
I agree. I mostly build rock crawlers but am working on a 1956 3600 build as well. Ideally you should cycle the suspension and measure full compression and full extension. However, at ride height I generally give 60% of the shock travel to compression and 40% to extension. In the rear application of a truck I would think this would be even more crucial as the ride height is generally a bit higher in the rear to account for loading of the bed or a trailer.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Thanks guys. At least I've been close all these years at 50/50 and as mentioned, I use to consider the weight factor, but on the pickups I've messed with it rarely comes into play.
Thanks for replying and I'm sure some others may chip in later.


1937 Chevy Pickup
In the Gallery
1952 Chevy Panel
In the Gallery
More photos
1950 Chevy Coupe
Pictures!

I'd rather walk and carry a Chevy hub cap than ride in a Ferd.
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you smile

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0