In case some of the information early in this post is confusing to a future reader, the page referred to in this statement in the post above is mistakenly associated with this topic:
Originally Posted by pfarber
.
.

The only direct mention of the heat riser I can find in the 54 Truck Service manual is page 6-57, and that's to turn off the auto-choke. Which was optional to begin with. Model BC carbs were only equipped on trucks with automatic transmissions.
.
.
The information on the Rochester [b]BC[/b] (model [b]B[/b] with automatic [b]C[/b]hoke) does not seem to refer to the manifold heat riser or the heat control valve that I think is the topic of this discussion.

Now, I'll go back to to being amused by statements about GM putting a supposedly unnecessary (or non-critical) device on the vast majority of its 216/235/261 and 228/248/270 engines (and on many/most 302 engines). And, I'll be puzzled by why GM would spend the money on putting this device on most of those engines, if it was/is not really useful/necessary?

Natter on with unsupportable opinions and speculations . . .