Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,116 Posts1,056,637 Members48,450 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Different truck and 20 years newer.... same may or may not apply.
The 2 speed Chevy axles up to 53 (that I know of) are all geared really slow, and limit top speed, but do allow you to (slowly) haul a lot of weight.
If a 2 speed is desirable or not all depends on your use and expatiations for the truck, and what exactly is the gear ratio in high? It's a sure thing that the 2 speed from a 51 is slow; one in a 70 may or may not be to slow, or even to fast, for your plans.
Grigg | | | |
Entire Thread
|
1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/12/2010 1:56 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| FriedGreenTmater | 11/12/2010 2:29 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| don stocker | 11/12/2010 2:36 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/12/2010 4:21 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| bluechev | 11/12/2010 4:46 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/12/2010 5:03 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Grigg | 11/12/2010 2:25 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Rich'sToys | 11/12/2010 4:02 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/12/2010 6:37 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Grigg | 11/12/2010 6:59 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| HevyHauler | 11/14/2010 9:13 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| alexrex20 | 11/23/2010 8:12 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Grigg | 11/23/2010 2:55 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| alexrex20 | 11/23/2010 4:46 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Grigg | 11/23/2010 5:08 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 12/02/2010 5:41 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Jrpontiac | 11/16/2010 4:11 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| andy46 | 11/16/2010 6:35 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Grigg | 11/16/2010 2:34 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| andy46 | 11/16/2010 4:48 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| Grigg | 11/16/2010 4:53 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| andy46 | 11/16/2010 7:35 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/18/2010 1:56 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| andy46 | 11/18/2010 4:57 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/20/2010 8:20 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 11/21/2010 7:47 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| FriedGreenTmater | 11/23/2010 3:21 PM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| 59_Apache | 12/04/2010 4:13 AM |
Re: 1951 one ton, should I get this??
| resto44 | 12/09/2010 7:58 PM | |
| |