Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (Stovebolt48, Materman, Rusted Nut, Hugh63c10, RoadsScholar, moparguy, SNOYL),
98
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,070 Posts1,055,892 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 | truckernix that is a great resource! About the best comparison/description I have ever seen. Lots of leg work by somebody(ies) to gather and compile that info. Perfect for ID'ing a motor from the exterior. If I could make one suggestion to the authors would be to include some discussion about the # of head bolts (15 v 18). Really great work; I saved it too. Thanks.
waldo53 I don't see how it can be a 216 or pre-50 235 block because of the way the side of the block and head are open under the tall side cover and you can see the push rods go past the spark plugs (when side cover is removed). That GAA code is definitely a 1949 code...
Hey, would a replacement motor/block have a serial number? Wasn't it the case that when the old motor was replaced by a new one the mechanic was supposed to stamp the original serial on the pad... What if the 49 216 was replaced with a new 50-52 235 and the old serial WAS stamped on the pad? (Did somebody think of that already?)
Professional Novice
| | | |
Entire Thread
|
216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 3:50 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| tclederman | 08/14/2010 6:40 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 11:08 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Hambone | 08/14/2010 12:14 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 5:31 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| tclederman | 08/14/2010 6:59 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 7:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 9:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 9:53 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Frank50 | 08/15/2010 12:29 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 2:52 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/15/2010 3:32 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 11:10 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Frank50 | 08/15/2010 1:14 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/15/2010 5:37 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 8:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/15/2010 11:49 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/16/2010 12:13 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/16/2010 11:43 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/17/2010 4:22 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/17/2010 11:49 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/26/2010 11:56 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| hoyt | 08/15/2010 3:29 AM | |
| |