Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
10 members (5 Window 9434, cmayna, 78buckshot, Samantha, DJMTruck, dt235sd, Opelika Tom, Gdads51, HandyAndy, 1 invisible),
94
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,062 Posts1,055,847 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | Here is a good description of the differences through the years: Chevy Six features Have a look at picture # 13. The mention of the "smooth" contour is a key point. If you have the smooth contour, it is a 50 to 52 low pressure. If you don't but it has the triangular plate, it would be a 1953 low pressure motor. | | | |
Entire Thread
|
216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 3:50 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| tclederman | 08/14/2010 6:40 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 11:08 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Hambone | 08/14/2010 12:14 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 5:31 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| tclederman | 08/14/2010 6:59 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 7:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 9:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 9:53 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Frank50 | 08/15/2010 12:29 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 2:52 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/15/2010 3:32 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 11:10 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Frank50 | 08/15/2010 1:14 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/15/2010 5:37 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 8:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/15/2010 11:49 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/16/2010 12:13 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/16/2010 11:43 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/17/2010 4:22 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/17/2010 11:49 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/26/2010 11:56 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| hoyt | 08/15/2010 3:29 AM | |
| |