Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (Gray_Ghost, cmayna, treegrower, Barney1951, UtahYork, Rusty Rod, TUTS 59, Rusty Heaps, 49choptop),
102
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,067 Posts1,055,877 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | Since we are all guessing, we should allow second guessing (until we get date codes and other codes - see below).
Does the car have a manual transmission (as was standard in 1949)?
Let's say it is a late 1949 car with a manual transmission and was treated as a 1950 engine/transmission combination. In 1950, the engine in a manual transmission car would have been a 216 (tall side cover). In 1950, the Powerglide was introduced and it was matched (standard equipment) with a 235 engine (short side cover).
Now, to follow through further in considering your theory, what is the block & head casting codes and block & head date casting codes?
| | | |
Entire Thread
|
216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 3:50 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| tclederman | 08/14/2010 6:40 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 11:08 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Hambone | 08/14/2010 12:14 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 5:31 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| tclederman | 08/14/2010 6:59 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 7:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/14/2010 9:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/14/2010 9:53 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Frank50 | 08/15/2010 12:29 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 2:52 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/15/2010 3:32 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 11:10 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Frank50 | 08/15/2010 1:14 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/15/2010 5:37 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/15/2010 8:23 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/15/2010 11:49 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/16/2010 12:13 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| Oilrag | 08/16/2010 11:43 PM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| waldo53 | 08/17/2010 4:22 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/17/2010 11:49 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| truckernix | 08/26/2010 11:56 AM |
Re: 216, 235, or ???
| hoyt | 08/15/2010 3:29 AM | |
| |