| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (artinva, Gdads51, 1955 1 Series, tesa, JW51, Peggy M, VicZ, Ridgeback, 1 invisible),
93
guests, and
0
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,077 Posts1,055,932 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 | Awhile back I upgraded my 1947 1st COE to a 12 volt system. I bought the appropriate Runtz reducers for the fuel and temperature gauge. Both gauges worked fine on the 6 volt system. The fuel gauge works fine on the 12 volt system with the voltage reducer. I fiddled and fiddled with trying to get the temp gauge to work and under no way could I get any reading, period.
I swapped out for the Chevrolet type of gauge with the capilary tube and never looked back.
Yesterday I pulled the dash out for a clean up and started wondering about the temp gauge again. Why would it not work with the Runtz reducer? Yet it still works if 6 volts is applied? I have a pair of GMC electric temp gauges and a few 6 volt senders for them.
Is it possible that the gauge could work without the reducer? I really dont want to fry the gauge attempting something that may not work.
Also, the Chevrolet gauge is barely long enough to work which is probably what started me thinking about the old GMC electrical gauge.
Any insight is appreciated!
Thanks, Jeff | | |
| |
| |