Mike .... Victor will explain it to you... But to put it more simply -- All that I'm purporting to provide are probability connections between subsequent impressions of the consciousness, and even though the dividing line between an observer, whose consciousness is being affected, and the observed physical object can be shifted towards the one or the other to a considerable degree, it cannot be eliminated. Yes?
Victor -- Thanks. That's probably the best advice I've received in a LONG time ... In my case, though, the reality I perceive myself to be in at any particular point in time more or less depends on Schrödinger's cat and the unique and particular relativistic modality that the cat induces as sort of a lensing effect affecting one's perception of of time's spectrum and our individual placement therein. But as with Hereclitus the Obscure, one never steps in the same stream twice so one can never be sure. I think ...
Peace love out
I'm puttingthe Wigner down and going back to Winnie the Pooh ...
By "time's spectrum" I assume that you are referring to the interface of the fabric of time-space. Without that, your statement does not hold water. I, as many I am certain, would appreciate that, in the future, you would explain your thoughts more thoroughly to avoid this type of unnecessary confusion. Thank you in advance.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
In my case, though, the reality I perceive myself to be in at any particular point in time more or less depends on Schrödinger's cat and the unique and particular relativistic modality that the cat induces as sort of a lensing effect affecting one's perception of of time's spectrum and our individual placement therein. But as with Hereclitus the Obscure, one never steps in the same stream twice so one can never be sure. I think ...