That's a good question, Jerry. I'd think it might take some creativity and imagination, but you have both of those.

Shane...the 292 wasn't short on torque at all. I've always thought most of those could be made to run a lot more economically if you put something good behind them rather than try to put something good in them. Most of the ones I saw were connected through 1:1 final gears to a rear end like the 4.11 or 3.90 or in some cases the 4.56. Always looked way out of whack to me.


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end