First, I stand by what i said... "abundance of examples where people have found alternative methods compensating or improving performance of their vehicles by simply adding, subtracting or modifying factory components" ...this concept is NOT mutually exclusive to the example I used so I'm not sure where you going with that one...

Second, I have not criticize the product or the life expectancy in any shape or form, therein. All I was inquiring about was an alternative way to remedy the problem.

All I was wondering was instead the cost of repairing the heat riser parts and machine work, which may not be adjusted right when you assemble it anyway would another option be to just use the choke. "To start a cold engine the choke is used to enrich the mixture is required. Without the choke, the fuel charge that reaches the cylinders would be too lean to ignite because colder air is denser. Even if the engine did start, until heat transfer occurred, fuel distribution might be impeeded because the gasoline would puddle in the runners of the intake manifold. Another concern is the slow cranking speed of the engine during start and the excessive friction that must be overcome by the starter motor. a choke would be required to enrich the air/fuel mixture, this is kinda what the heat riser does to atomize the fuel and once the intake manifold is hot enough for good fuel vaporization, you can take off the choke as opposed to actually the heat riser doing the job is what i was thinking

Last edited by heavy40chevy; 06/25/2015 2:15 AM.