| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,113 Posts1,056,279 Members48,439 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Jul 2013 Posts: 46 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jul 2013 Posts: 46 | need help prior to removing my huck rear brakes. Will 1953 3100 bendix style bolt to my 1950 huck axle. Lots of work so I really would like to know they will fit prior to getting started. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,248 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,248 | The backing plate would be different. I'm think it is riveted to rear axle flange..... Once you change the backing plate the rest should fit then..... Bendix used different wheel cylinders than the Huck did. the Bendix should give you better braking. They are self energizing brakes, the Huck brakes were not. You should change both front and rear to be the same.
John | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | The mounting flange that the backing plates are riveted to are in a different position. It's a no go. Easier to change to a Bendix housing.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | |
|
|
| |
