Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (cmayna, Gray_Ghost, Donf, Otto Skorzeny, Gdads51, Jon G, Forty9, Shade Baby),
102
guests, and
0
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,118 Posts1,056,306 Members48,439 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2012 Posts: 42 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2012 Posts: 42 | I just bought a 46 chevy truck and it has a 235 V6 and it came with a 4 speed saginaw transmission, 355:1 ring and pinion,torque tube conversion kit, 11" front disc brakes, and all installation kits that need to be installed. My original idea was to put a V8, auto transmission and m2 ifs. My question is? If I installed these parts and rebuilt the front end. Other than having to shift and not as much power would there be a big difference in the the ride and do you think that I would have enough power to drive 70 mph on highway and drive in mountain areas and keep up with other cars. Thanks | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | 235 V6?? wassat? the 3.55 rear should get you to 70 and keep up with traffic with any engine .... if you have everything to build a complete useable truck, why start over?
Bill | | | | | Joined: Nov 2012 Posts: 15 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Nov 2012 Posts: 15 | 235 V6? Hmmm, the 235 inline is a great engine and actually has more torque (power) than a comparable V8. If your trucks drivable, drive it for a while before doing any major surgery. In short the straight-six/4-spd/3.55 combo should be fine on the interstate and really come alive in the mountains where the V8/auto would just dog. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 1,363 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 1,363 | 235 is a straight 6, no american car or truck manufacture made a V6 in the 40's 50's or 60's that I know of. All 6 cylinder engine were inline cylinder designs. Smooth running and good balance are one of the reasons for using that design. Didn't they use a 216 in the 40's? I don't know.
Kicking self for selling off my Taskforce trucks. Still looking for an LCF or conventional big bolt in decent shape.
As of 10-26-2022, A 55.2 Taskforce long bed now the work begins
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 583 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 583 | Didn't GMC truck, and either Buick or Oldsmobile have a V6 engine in the 60's?
1939 Chevrolet Stake Truck
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | yes, GMC had a V6 in the 60's, but they were 305, 351 and larger, not a 235 Bill | | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 109 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 109 | Yes the GMC had a V6 305, 351 and a couple bigger. http://www.6066gmcguy.org/Some neat info there. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2012 Posts: 42 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2012 Posts: 42 | My mistake. The engine is a inline 6 | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 | I'm sure he has a 235 and with 3.55 gears he should do just fine unless he gets into some real mountains, but then the 4 cylinders will be right along with him. If it is indeed a Saginaw, its probably a pretty close ratio between 3 and 4 which is good in mountains. Going to a V8 with an automatic would be a major undertaking that I wouldn't recommend. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 603 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 603 | Yeah, I remember seeing those old V-6,s in the GMC trucks. The ones with the scalloped valve covers, like a car 348 or 409 V-8. I thought the V-6 was a real neat engine, would like to have one of those. I was looking at the pics. posted by Red58. Where are the spark plugs?
57 GMC LCF 370 55 John Deere 40-W 59 John Deere 430-W 2000 GMC 4x4 56 John Deere 420-W Pix on Photobucket | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | I didn't post the pics, Jolly did the plugs are inside the V instead of above the hot exhaust manifolds Bill | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 | I had a GMC 478 V6 Magnum in a 1970 Tilt Cab and it was a monster...pass anything but the gas station...lol. If I remember right it was 235 HP, not bad for a 6-cylinder! They take up as much room as a big block Chevy. Would be something different if it was installed in a small truck! Mike B  | | | | | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 531 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 531 | The engine in my 551/2 Panel is a rebuilt 1960 235. Changed the gear ratio in the original rear end (56) with the gear kit. The truck runs fine - cruises along comfortably at 60 (I think, my speedo and odo don't work). | | | | | Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 1,363 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 1,363 | Sorry guys forgot about GMC.
Kicking self for selling off my Taskforce trucks. Still looking for an LCF or conventional big bolt in decent shape.
As of 10-26-2022, A 55.2 Taskforce long bed now the work begins
| | |
| |