The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (texas46, Bill Hanlon, 1955 1 Series, Peggy M, KingG, Brian Moore), 114 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,022
Posts1,055,382
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#913893 01/22/2013 10:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 133
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 133
I just set my newly painted "48" five window cab that came off a ton and 1/2 grain truck on my "52" 1/2 ton frame. The cap has a rear mount pivot point that is centered on the cab and sits on the frame cross member. The frame has has the hangers installed that were used with the shackle system from the "52" cab. I have new rubber bushings and the shackles the "52" cab I removed used. Question is which mounting is better to use. All I have to do is drill a couple holes in the crossmember and the center pivot mount will work. Would it be an overkill to just use both systems.


If you never tell a lie, you never need to remember what you said.
Bart_Bosco #913908 01/22/2013 11:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,596
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,596
Well the shackle was the factory solution to service complaints about cracking with the center mount style. Here is a description of the problem located here:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/1947-1955-chevrolet-trucks2.htm
The cab itself, which had previously been attached to the frame at three points via shackle bolts and rubber mounts, was now mounted at four points. The idea of the three-point system was to let the frame flex without affecting the cab. This worked well, but the single forward mount put too much stress on the front frame crossmember, so two smaller shackle mounts were set on the forward chassis rails instead. The cab was still unaffected by frame flexing thanks to the lessened tension of the shackle bolts.
Frame flexing had caused other problems as well. There'd been complaints, for example, that the 1947-1948 radiator support in the 3100s tended to twist and shake loose after many miles on rough roads. This caused splits in the radiator core, and cracks in front-end sheetmetal. For 1949, Chevrolet added X-bracing to the radiator support frame, reinforced the bottom channel, and mounted the entire assembly more rigidly.
In my opinion both is overkill. The issues outlined above were for the time they were built and used. For most of us our trucks will never see the use that caused these problems. I drive my truck 1500 miles a year in good weather, on good roads so I think either system will serve you well.

Last edited by Brad Allen; 01/23/2013 10:16 AM.

Moderated by  klhansen 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0