The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (tclederman, Otto Skorzeny, 1 invisible), 116 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,076
Posts1,055,920
Members48,429
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 97
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 97
Little background before I get to my actual question. For the front I've got the Flat Out Engineering C4 IFS kit. I already have all of the C4 suspension. For the rear I'm going with the Ride Tech Universal 4 link suspension. This past weekend I got the 9 inch F*rd rear end which is out of a 73 Gran Torino.

My question is there a "better" order for converting the axles or is it simply personal preference? I am thinking that converting the rear suspension will be the better option because I can get the front of my truck to the ride height easier after it is done. Plus part of the instructions for the C4 calls for me to notch the outsides of the frame in order for the cross member to slide up into the frame.

Thoughts?


Carson Holloway
[email protected]
Truck: 1949 Chevy 3100
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 434
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 434
I am in kinda the same situation. I am putting Fatman's Mustang II IFS and No Limit Engineering Fatbar 4-link in rear.

I am seriously considering starting with the rear first because I am putting an under the bed fuel tank in and I will first make sure it and the rear fit together and then proceed to the front.

Also want to put in a K or X brace and box the frame while I've got it there in the open.

And maybe I just want to avoid fitting motor and trans between radiator and firewall and nothing more...I can't think of much of a difference it makes.

This is a 59 frame, but no incredible differences in the basic ladder frame riveted C-section technology--same as with your 49, for what I know.

Pinion angle you can set in the rear and then weld in engine mounts to match right. So...I don't know that it really makes any difference.

Maybe someone will jump in with some better thoughts, I'm not claiming experience or knowledge here, just some thoughts on how I got to my approach.


R-Bo

1959 Apache 1/2 ton Big Window, Short bed Fleetside (under reconstruction)
1966 GMC 305V6 in the family
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 97
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 97
Yea i'm pretty much set on doing the rear first due to the notching of the frame in the front. Plus this gives me some time on getting the X or K brace in the middle and also where the motor mounts go.

Thanks for your input.


Carson Holloway
[email protected]
Truck: 1949 Chevy 3100
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 800
K
k10 Offline
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
K Offline
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 800
Don't forget to use weight bags or other weight before you make the final setup. Too many guys get everything all set........and then, oops. The driveshaft is too long, the wheels and tires scrape, the driveline angle is wrong, etc,... you'll have a bed of wood and sheetmetal and maybe a tank of gas to think about. It doesn't sound like the truck will ever haul a load again, so that won't be a consideration.:)

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 97
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 97
Using weight bags is a good idea. Something I haven't though about. I might not haul a load again that's not to say I won't be putting some luggage in the bed.


Carson Holloway
[email protected]
Truck: 1949 Chevy 3100

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0